62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7867464)
1. Postmenopausal squamous-cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge.
Saminathan T; Lahoti C; Kannan V; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 7867464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cervical cytological screening results between postmenopausal and elderly women.
Cakmak B; Köseoğlu DR
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2014; 30(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 24448705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atypical reparative change on cervical/vaginal smears may be associated with dysplasia.
Rimm DL; Gmitro S; Frable WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 8725141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [ASCUS of metaplastic type. Cyto-histopathological correlations].
Teleman S; Anton C; Socolov D; Ungureanu C; Danciu M; Mihailovici MS
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2004; 108(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 15688762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women.
Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cohen JM; Cangiarella JF
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11241259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization.
Sheils LA; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1065-72. PubMed ID: 9250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ASCUS, mature metaplastic type. Cytologic diagnosis and follow-up.
Gupta D; Kannan V; Komaromy-Hiller G; Kline TS
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11284305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
Kline MJ; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM; Haefner HK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Nov; 13(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 8599925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
