These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7867901)

  • 1. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. III. Statistical models.
    Allen BC; Kavlock RJ; Kimmel CA; Faustman EM
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):496-509. PubMed ID: 7867901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose-response assessments for developmental toxicity. IV. Benchmark doses for fetal weight changes.
    Kavlock RJ; Allen BC; Faustman EM; Kimmel CA
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Jul; 26(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 7589910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. II. Comparison of generic benchmark dose estimates with no observed adverse effect levels.
    Allen BC; Kavlock RJ; Kimmel CA; Faustman EM
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 7867900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. I. Characterization of database and determination of no observed adverse effect levels.
    Faustman EM; Allen BC; Kavlock RJ; Kimmel CA
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 7867899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-Response Modeling with Summary Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies.
    Fox JF; Hogan KA; Davis A
    Risk Anal; 2017 May; 37(5):905-917. PubMed ID: 27567129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of benchmark dose methodology to data from prenatal developmental toxicity studies.
    Kimmel CA; Kavlock RJ; Allen BC; Faustman EM
    Toxicol Lett; 1995 Dec; 82-83():549-54. PubMed ID: 8597108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of the potential impact of benchmark dose and pharmacokinetic modeling in noncancer risk assessment.
    Clewell HJ; Gentry PR; Gearhart JM
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Dec; 52(6):475-515. PubMed ID: 9397182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculation of benchmark doses for reproductive and developmental toxicity observed after exposure to isopropanol.
    Allen B; Gentry R; Shipp A; Van Landingham C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9784431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the Rai and Van Ryzin dose-response model in teratology.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Risk Anal; 1991 Mar; 11(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 2038612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of a developmental toxicity dose-response model.
    Faustman EM; Wellington DG; Smith WP; Kimmel CA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1989 Feb; 79():229-41. PubMed ID: 2707204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between fetal weight and litter size in rats: application to reproductive toxicology studies.
    Romero A; Villamayor F; Grau MT; Sacristán A; Ortiz JA
    Reprod Toxicol; 1992; 6(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 1463926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simulation study of the influence of study design on the estimation of benchmark doses for developmental toxicity.
    Kavlock RJ; Schmid JE; Setzer RW
    Risk Anal; 1996 Jun; 16(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 8693165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mathematical modeling of reproductive and developmental toxic effects for quantitative risk assessment.
    Kodell RL; Howe RB; Chen JJ; Gaylor DW
    Risk Anal; 1991 Dec; 11(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 1780500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology.
    Williams DA
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):305-9. PubMed ID: 3358995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues in qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for developmental toxicology.
    Kimmel CA; Gaylor DW
    Risk Anal; 1988 Mar; 8(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 3375503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NTP toxicity report of reproductive dose range-finding study of Genistein (CAS No. 446-72-0) administered in feed to Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Delclos KB; Newbold R
    Toxic Rep Ser; 2007 Nov; (79):1-C2. PubMed ID: 18685712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 1581483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.