205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7868104)
1. Historical development of legal protection for the rights of mentally ill persons in France.
Thoret Y; Kantin S
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 45(12):1211-4. PubMed ID: 7868104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oregon's civil commitment law: 140 years of change.
Bloom JD; Williams MH
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 May; 45(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 8045542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The historic antecedents to the current polemics on involuntary psychiatric hospitalization.
Peszke MA
Compr Psychiatry; 1984; 25(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 6368120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of French, Spanish, and English legal traditions on early mental health proceedings in Louisiana.
Peña JM; Franklin R; Thompson JW; Minyard F; Carbin C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 14584535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Law and the delivery of involuntary mental health services.
La Fond JQ
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1994 Apr; 64(2):209-22. PubMed ID: 8037230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical certification of the mentally ill: a protection for the individual's rights.
Milliken AD
Can J Psychiatry; 1983 Mar; 28(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 6340819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal issues in mental health administration.
Mills MJ; Cummins BD; Gracey JS
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 6642825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Gove WR; Tovo M; Hughes M
Deviant Behav; 1985; 6():287-318. PubMed ID: 11658830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness.
Burgett DW
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.
Levy A; Davidson S
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. My father's advocacy for a right to treatment.
Birnbaum R
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20305085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Civil commitment from a systems perspective.
Appelbaum PS
Law Hum Behav; 1992 Feb; 16(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 11659671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fitness to be sentenced: a historical, comparative and practical review.
Manson A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):262-80. PubMed ID: 16725201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
Meisel A
Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dangerousness and commitment of the mentally disordered in the United States.
Monahan J; Shah SA
Schizophr Bull; 1989; 15(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 2696085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
