67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7868115)
1. Chromosomal bands affected by acute oil exposure and DNA repair errors.
Monyarch G; de Castro Reis F; Zock JP; Giraldo J; Pozo-Rodríguez F; Espinosa A; Rodríguez-Trigo G; Verea H; Castaño-Vinyals G; Gómez FP; Antó JM; Coll MD; Barberà JA; Fuster C
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81276. PubMed ID: 24303039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expression and identification of folate-sensitive fragile sites in British Suffolk sheep (Ovis aries).
Ali A; Abdullah M; Babar ME; Javed K; Nadeem A
J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 19147906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chromosomal instability in Afrotheria: fragile sites, evolutionary breakpoints and phylogenetic inference from genome sequence assemblies.
Ruiz-Herrera A; Robinson TJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Oct; 7():199. PubMed ID: 17958882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fragile sites in human and Macaca fascicularis chromosomes are breakpoints in chromosome evolution.
Ruiz-Herrera A; Ponsà M; García F; Egozcue J; García M
Chromosome Res; 2002; 10(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 11863068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Susceptibility of heterochromatin to aphidicolin-induced chromosomal breakage.
Dominguez AM; Smith SA; Greenbaum IF
Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 96(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 8529996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Common fragile sites and cancer (review).
Smith DI; Huang H; Wang L
Int J Oncol; 1998 Jan; 12(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 9454904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements.
Arlt MF; Durkin SG; Ragland RL; Glover TW
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Sep; 5(9-10):1126-35. PubMed ID: 16807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: a multinomial statistical model.
Böhm U; Dahm PF; McAllister BF; Greenbaum IF
Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 95(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 7868115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum sample sizes for identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: Monte Carlo estimation.
Greenbaum IF; Fulton JK; White ED; Dahm PF
Hum Genet; 1997 Nov; 101(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 9385380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How common are common fragile sites: variation of aphidicolin-induced chromosomal fragile sites in a population of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).
McAllister BF; Greenbaum IF
Hum Genet; 1997 Aug; 100(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 9254846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying chromosomal fragile sites from a hierarchical-clustering point of view.
Hou CD; Chiang J; Tai JJ
Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):435-40. PubMed ID: 11414567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probability models and the applicability of statistical procedures in the identification of chromosomal fragile sites.
Dahm PF; Olmsted AW; Greenbaum IF
Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1028-31; discussion 1032-3. PubMed ID: 12495159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sister chromatid exchanges are preferentially induced at expressed and nonexpressed common fragile sites.
Hirsch B
Hum Genet; 1991 Jul; 87(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 1864605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method for testing the nonrandomness of chromosomal breakpoints.
Tai JJ; Hou CD; Wang-Wuu S; Wang CH; Leu SY; Wuu KD
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1993; 63(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 8485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconsideration of the binomial and F distribution relationship as a test for nonrandomness of chromosomal breakage.
Dahm PF; Greenbaum IF
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1994; 66(3):214-5. PubMed ID: 8125020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
