BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7869681)

  • 1. [15 years automated perimetry--where does the path lead?].
    Lachenmayr B; Lund OE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Dec; 205(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 7869681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Automated flicker perimetry].
    Lachenmayr B; Gleissner M; Rothbächer H
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 2625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Perimetry yesterday and today].
    Lachenmayr B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Jul; 193(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 3054254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Automated static perimetry in the child: methodologic and practical problems].
    Tschopp C; Safran AB; Laffi JL; Mermoud C; Bullinger A; Viviani P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 May; 206(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 7609403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hemianopic visual field defects--methods of study and localization problems].
    Gloor B; Vollrath C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 May; 192(5):507-17. PubMed ID: 3404961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fundus-oriented perimetry. Evaluation of a new visual field examination method for detecting angioscotoma].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G; Dietrich TJ; Friedrich M; Benda N
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):62-71. PubMed ID: 8992085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study].
    Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [What new knowledge has automated perimetry with the Octopus brought on glaucomatous visual field changes?].
    Gloor B; Stürmer J; Vökt B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Apr; 184(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 6727246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the oculo-kinetic perimetry glaucoma screening test in a sub-Saharan African setting.
    Mahmoud AO; Omalase CO; Ekundayo K
    West Afr J Med; 2008 Jul; 27(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 19256315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical comparison of visual field testing between Goldmann-type manual perimetry and the Marco MT-336 automated perimeter.
    Jennings BJ; Drake SA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Dec; 62(12):914-22. PubMed ID: 1814984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Levy NS; Ellis E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Recent developments in kinetic perimetry].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(6):798-801. PubMed ID: 15787186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
    Gleissner M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LED perimeter for visual field analysis by mapping of small field evoked potentials.
    Psatta DM; Amzică F; Matei M
    Rom J Neurol Psychiatry; 1992; 30(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 1633097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.