These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7869952)

  • 1. Patient registration and treatment allocation in multicenter clinical trials using a FAX-OCR system.
    Akazawa K; Kamakura T; Sakamoto M; Odaka T; Nose Y
    Methods Inf Med; 1994 Dec; 33(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 7869952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A random allocation system with the minimization method for multi-institutional clinical trials.
    Akazawa K; Odaka T; Sakamoto M; Ohtsuki S; Shimada M; Kamakura T; Nose Y
    J Med Syst; 1991 Aug; 15(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 1800602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical dynamic allocation procedures based on modified Zelen's approach in multiregional studies with unequal allocation.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):785-801. PubMed ID: 24697592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A flexible random allocation program for multi-institutional clinical trials.
    Odaka T; Akazawa K; Watanabe Y; Nose Y; Ogura H
    J Med Syst; 1994 Feb; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 8064207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An automated patient registration and treatment randomization system.
    Papaconstantinou C; Krischer JP
    J Med Syst; 1995 Dec; 19(6):445-56. PubMed ID: 8750375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An easily customized, random allocation system using the minimization method for multi-institutional clinical trials.
    Kenjo Y; Antoku Y; Akazawa K; Hanada E; Kinukawa N; Nose Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2000 May; 62(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10699684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An automated patient registration and treatment randomization system for multicenter clinical trials.
    Krischer JP; Hurley C; Pillalamarri M; Pant S; Bleichfeld C; Opel M; Shuster JJ
    Control Clin Trials; 1991 Jun; 12(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 1651208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation and experience of a web-based allocation system with Pocock and Simon's minimization methods.
    Cai HW; Xia JL; Gao DH; Cao XM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 20674777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expansion of the modified Zelen's approach randomization and dynamic randomization with partial block supplies at the centers to unequal allocation.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov; 32(6):962-72. PubMed ID: 21888990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trials.
    Signorini DF; Leung O; Simes RJ; Beller E; Gebski VJ; Callaghan T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2343-50. PubMed ID: 8134737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.
    Cai H; Xia J; Xu D; Gao D; Yan Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):706-19. PubMed ID: 16616696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model to control data flow in multicenter clinical trials.
    Pampallona S
    Methods Inf Med; 1995 Jun; 34(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 7666807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomised studies in general practice: how to integrate the electronic patient record.
    Mosis G; Koes B; Dieleman J; Stricker BCh; van der Lei J; Sturkenboom MC
    Inform Prim Care; 2005; 13(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16259861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomization in cancer clinical trials: permutation test and development of a computer program.
    Ohashi Y
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():13-7. PubMed ID: 2269216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of keying data from screen-displayed facsimile images in an ongoing trial: the collaborative ocular melanoma study.
    Diener-West M; Connor PB; Newhouse MM; Hawkins BS
    Control Clin Trials; 1998 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 9492968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical monitoring of data quality and consistency in the Stomach Cancer Adjuvant Multi-institutional Trial Group Trial.
    Timmermans C; Doffagne E; Venet D; Desmet L; Legrand C; Burzykowski T; Buyse M
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Jan; 19(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 26298185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recruitment in Clinical Trials: The Use of Zelen's Prerandomization in Recent Neurovascular Studies.
    Raymond J; Darsaut TE; Roy DJ
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 98():403-410. PubMed ID: 27876665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials.
    Raudenbush SW; Liu X
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 10937329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The minimization method in a medium size clinical trial. Study of immunochemotherapy with PSK in gastric cancer].
    Sakamoto J; Nakazato H; Ichihashi H; Koike A; Ohashi Y; Tamura H; Fujii T; Ogawa N
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 Jun; 15(6):1935-42. PubMed ID: 3289503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.