BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7870486)

  • 1. Predicting speech recognition thresholds from pure tone hearing thresholds.
    Coren S; Hakstian AR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Oct; 79(2):1003-8. PubMed ID: 7870486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
    Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The NTID speech recognition test: NSRT(®).
    Bochner JH; Garrison WM; Doherty KA
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):490-8. PubMed ID: 25634775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions.
    Kimberley BP; Kimberley BM; Roth L
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Nov; 73(11):812-3, 817-23. PubMed ID: 7828474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing.
    Engdahl B; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 23216196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation of pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): a review of measurement variability and age-specific references.
    Lemkens N; Vermeire K; Brokx JP; Fransen E; Van Camp G; Van De Heyning PH
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2002; 56(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 12528251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
    Corthals P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Correlation of auditory brainstem evoked potentials and pure tone audiometric thresholds].
    Martínez Ibarguen A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1993; 44(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 8357628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.