133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7872590)
1. Mammographic screening for women aged 40 to 49 years: the primary care practitioner's dilemma.
Sickles EA; Kopans DB
Ann Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 122(7):534-8. PubMed ID: 7872590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography outcomes in a practice setting by age: prognostic factors, sensitivity, and positive biopsy rate.
Linver MN; Paster SB
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):113-7. PubMed ID: 9709286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?
van Dijck JA; Broeders MJ; Verbeek AL
Drugs Aging; 1997 Feb; 10(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 9061265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative interpretation of age-specific mortality reductions from the Swedish breast cancer-screening trials.
de Koning HJ; Boer R; Warmerdam PG; Beemsterboer PM; van der Maas PJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Aug; 87(16):1217-23. PubMed ID: 7563167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Nelson HD; Fu R; Cantor A; Pappas M; Daeges M; Humphrey L
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 26756588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival advantage differences by age. Evaluation of the extended follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
Byrne C; Smart CR; Chu KC; Hartmann WH
Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):301-10. PubMed ID: 8004601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Encouraging attendance at screening mammography: knowledge, attitudes and intentions of general practitioners.
Cockburn J; Irwig L; Turnbull D; Simpson JM; Mock P; Tattersall M
Med J Aust; 1989 Oct; 151(7):391-6. PubMed ID: 2796815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.
Hendrick RE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29267146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years. Is it justified?
Feig SA
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Dec; 21(4):587-606. PubMed ID: 7731636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
Ringash J;
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography.
Sickles EA
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):99-104. PubMed ID: 9709284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Rubin SM; Sandrock C; Ernster VL
JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 7799496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.
Shen N; Hammonds LS; Madsen D; Dale P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3066-71. PubMed ID: 21863364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
