These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7873071)
1. Critical evaluation of the use of skin tests and cellular tests in standardization of allergens. de Weck AL; Derer T Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 1994; (87):89-114; discussion 114-7. PubMed ID: 7873071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen]. Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Use of thermographic methods for estimation of skin prick test results. II. Evaluation of skin prick test results with histamine solutions of different concentration using liquid crystal mixtures]. Zuber J; Kruszewski J; Zmija J; Kłosowicz S; Jung A Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 1996; 64(3-4):123-31. PubMed ID: 8754955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Specific skin reactions induced by individual pollen preparations in hypersensitivity persons]. Paranos S; Petrović S; Vojović I Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(9-10):362-7. PubMed ID: 9863408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of the anti-allergic activity of azelastine on the immediate and late-phase reactions to allergens and histamine using telethermography. De Weck AL; Derer T; Bähre M Clin Exp Allergy; 2000 Feb; 30(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 10651782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children. Roovers MH; Gerth van Wijk R; Dieges PH; van Toorenenbergen AW Ann Allergy; 1990 Feb; 64(2 Pt 1):166-9. PubMed ID: 1689560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of thermography for the assessment of allergen-induced skin reactions. Rokita E; Rok T; Tatoń G Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):765-72. PubMed ID: 21452714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histamine release in skin monitored with the microdialysis technique does not correlate with the weal size induced by cow allergen. Horsmanheimo L; Harvima IT; Harvima RJ; Ylönen J; Naukkarinen A; Horsmanheimo M Br J Dermatol; 1996 Jan; 134(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8745892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing. Pagani M; Antico A; Cilia M; Calabrò D; Poto S; Pecora S; Burastero SE Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2009 Feb; 41(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19496349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergen skin prick test should be adjusted by the histamine reactivity. Dreborg S Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25765942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of intradermal and prick tests based on samples of the most common allergens in the Zadar region]. Mazzi A Lijec Vjesn; 1995; 117(3-4):76-9. PubMed ID: 8538357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device. Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing. Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of theophylline on allergen skin tests. Johnson CE; McLean JA Am J Hosp Pharm; 1978 Sep; 35(9):1045-7. PubMed ID: 696747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility and use of low-concentration skin prick test. Bordignon V; Parmiani S J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2000; 10(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 10879994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of terbutaline and bambuterol on immediate-type allergic skin responses and mediator release in human skin. Petersen LJ; Skov PS Inflamm Res; 2003 Sep; 52(9):372-7. PubMed ID: 14504664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle]. Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The longest wheal diameter is the optimal measurement for the evaluation of skin prick tests. Konstantinou GN; Bousquet PJ; Zuberbier T; Papadopoulos NG Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2010; 151(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 19851076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The use of laser Doppler flowmetry for assessment of skin prick tests with histamine solutions and allergens]. Zakrzewski A; Kruszewski J; Kłos K; Lademann A Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Mar; 18(105):282-6. PubMed ID: 15997633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests. Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]