These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7873296)

  • 21. Follow-up of individual patients on two DXA scanners of the same manufacturer.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 11095175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
    Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
    Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
    Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Hologic QDR-1000/W and 4500W DXA Scanners in 13- to 18-Year Olds.
    Litaker MS; Barbeau P; Humphries MC; Gutin B
    Obes Res; 2003 Dec; 11(12):1545-52. PubMed ID: 14694220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).
    Mas ID; Biscardi A; Ripamonti U
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 12357069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database.
    Benmalek A; Sabatier JP
    Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross-calibration of pencil-beam (DPX-NT) and fan-beam (QDR-4500C) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for sarcopenia.
    Ito K; Tsushita K; Muramoto A; Kanzaki H; Nohara T; Shimizu H; Nakazawa T; Harada A
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 77(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 26663943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].
    Yang DZ; Shang JY; Song WZ; Chen J; Zhu D; Wang WZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 12905736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system.
    Bouyoucef SE; Cullum ID; Ell PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):522-31. PubMed ID: 8757654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer.
    Boudousq V; Kotzki PO; Dinten JM; Barrau C; Robert-Coutant C; Thomas E; Goulart DM
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 May; 14(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 12730787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RS; Steinberg FM; Lewis RD; Young RL; Wong WW
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 15618602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam.
    Mazess RB; Hanson JA; Payne R; Nord R; Wilson M
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10793875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of spine bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats using DXA.
    Yamauchi H; Kushida K; Yamazaki K; Inoue T
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 7484278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the Stratos, a new pencil-beam bone densitometer: dosimetry, precision, and cross calibration.
    Nalda E; Mahadea KK; Dematteï C; Kotzki PO; Pouget JP; Boudousq V
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 21839660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers.
    Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Majerovic Y; Griffiths MR
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Jan; 60(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 9030472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
    Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.