105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7874413)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Hickman PF; Moore NR; Shepstone BJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):14-20. PubMed ID: 8298869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography of both breasts following local excision and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma.
Murray AD; Redpath TW; Needham G; Gilbert FJ; Brookes JA; Eremin O
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):594-600. PubMed ID: 8696694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations.
Cohen EK; Leonhardt CM; Shumak RS; Soutar IC; Bukhanov K; Fishell EK; Plewes DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.
Turkat TJ; Klein BD; Polan RL; Richman RH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 7949682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma.
Rieber A; Merkle E; Zeitler H; Görich J; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Tomczak R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9294575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
Kerslake RW; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Read JR; Bowsley SJ; Buckley DL; Horsman A
Clin Radiol; 1995 Jul; 50(7):440-54. PubMed ID: 7614789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Fobben ES; Rubin CZ; Kalisher L; Dembner AG; Seltzer MH; Santoro EJ
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 7784558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients.
Gilles R; Guinebretière JM; Shapeero LG; Lesnik A; Contesso G; Sarrazin D; Masselot J; Vanel D
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 8327700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quantitative assessment of therapy related effects after breast conserving therapy with dynamic MRI of the breast].
Wersebe A; Xydeas T; Clauss T; Dietz K; Belka C; Fersis N; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Dec; 173(12):1109-17. PubMed ID: 11740672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with dynamic MR imaging.
Müller-Schimpfle M; Brix G; Layer G; Schlag P; Engenhart R; Frohmuller S; Hess T; Zuna I; Semmler W; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):881-9. PubMed ID: 8234720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Dao TH; Rahmouni A; Campana F; Laurent M; Asselain B; Fourquet A
Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):751-5. PubMed ID: 8497625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
