BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7874413)

  • 21. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
    Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
    Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A case of fat necrosis after breast quadrantectomy in which preoperative diagnosis was enabled by MRI with fat suppression technique.
    Iwasaki H; Morimoto K; Koh M; Okamura T; Wakasa K; Wakasa T; Kinoshita H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 22(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 15010123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in MRT in breast carcinoma].
    Hess T; Knopp MV; Hoffmann U; Brix G; Junkermann H; Zuna I; von Fournier D; van Kaick G
    Rofo; 1994 Jun; 160(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 8011997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
    Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
    Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Subtraction and dynamic MR images of breast cancer].
    Murakami Y; Aoki M; Harada J
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Apr; 53(4):375-86. PubMed ID: 8493070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations.
    Kaiser WA; Zeitler E
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):681-6. PubMed ID: 2916021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 8144345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
    Kuhl CK; Bieling H; Gieseke J; Ebel T; Mielcarek P; Far F; Folkers P; Elevelt A; Schild HH
    Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8988196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Contrast medium assisted dynamic MR-mammography after diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the breast].
    Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Kopka L; Kahlen O; Grabbe E
    Bildgebung; 1996 Jun; 63(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 8756151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [MR mammography of fatty tissue necrosis].
    Kurtz B; Achten C; Audretsch W; Rezai M; Zocholl G
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 8963048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
    Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Dynamic imaging with magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of breast disease].
    Ercolani P; Giovagnoni A; Giuseppetti G; Baldassarre S; De Nigris E; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 1767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
    Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times with FLASH for dynamic MRI of the breast.
    Brookes JA; Redpath TW; Gilbert FJ; Needham G; Murray AD
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):206-14. PubMed ID: 8800863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The MRT of the breast with 2D-spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences in diagnostically problematic cases].
    Allgayer B; Lukas P; Loos W; Kersting-Sommerhoff B
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 8490150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla].
    Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of partial volume and phase shift between fat and water in gradient-echo magnetic resonance-mammography.
    Peller M; Stehling MK; Sittek H; Kessler M; Reiser M
    MAGMA; 1996 Jun; 4(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 8875396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
    Belli P; Pastore G; Romani M; Terribile D; Canadè A; Costantini M
    Rays; 2002; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.