These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7874433)

  • 1. The siting of consistency checks on mobile image intensifier automatic brightness controls.
    Nicholson RA
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1281. PubMed ID: 7874433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best practices in digital radiography.
    Herrmann TL; Fauber TL; Gill J; Hoffman C; Orth DK; Peterson PA; Prouty RR; Woodward AP; Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 84(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 22988267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation protection in fluoroscopy with an image intensifier.
    Hemmingsson A; Löfroth PO
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1978; 19(6):1007-13. PubMed ID: 735836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.
    Don S; Whiting BR; Rutz LJ; Apgar BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23169727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mobile image intensifier in the orthopaedic theatre.
    Dwyer CJ; Fry RM
    Radiography; 1974 Nov; 40(479):264-6. PubMed ID: 4464526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Technical measures for radiation protection on the surgical image intensifier].
    Ewen K; Schmitt G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1974 Sep; 27(9):216-21. PubMed ID: 4432160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality.
    Tapiovaara MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):244-8. PubMed ID: 18252851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control.
    Reilly AJ; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):938-48. PubMed ID: 11675312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.
    Gudjónsdóttir J; Ween B; Olsen DR
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20207787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tube potential and CT radiation dose optimization.
    Lira D; Padole A; Kalra MK; Singh S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W4-10. PubMed ID: 25539272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children.
    Goske MJ; Charkot E; Herrmann T; John SD; Mills TT; Morrison G; Smith SN
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 21491201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
    Johnson M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital cine angiography permits radiation dose reduction without reduction in image quality.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Umezu Y; Shimamura M; Ogawa K; Kato T; Hashida M; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15940060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dosage from use of the image intensifier in orthopaedic surgery.
    Lo NN; Goh PS; Khong KS
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 8783918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dose output at an image intensifier with peak value- or mean value-control].
    Bronder T
    Strahlentherapie; 1985 Jan; 161(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 3969693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statement by MITA on behalf of the MITA CR-DR group of the X-ray section.
    Vastagh S
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):566. PubMed ID: 21221563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Radiation protective problems in the use of X-ray image intensifier in the operating room (author's transl].
    Voigt A; Heilmann P
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1974; 15(6):825-8. PubMed ID: 4464537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.