115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7874633)
1. Total hip replacement: the case for noncemented femoral fixation because of age.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Tugwell PS; Wong C; Bullas R
Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 7874633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):212-23. PubMed ID: 9917606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The case for cementing all femoral components in total hip replacement.
Harris WH
Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S55-60. PubMed ID: 7874631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fixation of the acetabular component. The case for cement.
Ranawat CS; Peters LE; Umlas ME
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):207-15. PubMed ID: 9372772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized clinical trial comparing cemented to cementless total hip replacement in 250 osteoarthritic patients: the impact on health related quality of life and cost effectiveness.
Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
Iowa Orthop J; 1994; 14():108-14. PubMed ID: 7719764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Total hip replacement in the elderly: cost-effective alternatives.
Evans BG; Salvati EA
Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():359-65. PubMed ID: 9097165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Mulliken BD; Nayak N; Laupacis A; Tugwell P; Feeney D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):330-44. PubMed ID: 8998896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Perioperative cost analysis of cemented versus uncemented total hip endoprostheses for clinical and economic management. Postoperative follow-up study over one year].
Könning H; Ackermann B; Seifert T; Wirth CJ
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 9499512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical results of cemented revision of primary cemented total hip arthroplasties.
Diekerhof CH; Barnaart LF; Rozing PM
Acta Orthop Belg; 2000 Oct; 66(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 11103490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The rationale for cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Evans BG; Salvati EA; Huo MH; Huk OL
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):599-610. PubMed ID: 8414425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival of cemented total hip replacements.
Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior approach to total hip replacement: surgical technique and clinical results of our first one thousand cases using non-cemented prostheses.
Keggi KJ; Huo MH; Zatorski LE
Yale J Biol Med; 1993; 66(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 8209560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life.
Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):156-64. PubMed ID: 8118970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Iorio R; Healy WL; Presutti AH
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 18534542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term survival of the T-28 versus the TR-28 cemented total hip arthroplasties.
Meding JB; Nassif JM; Ritter MA
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):928-33. PubMed ID: 11061455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of noncemented revision.
Dorr LD
Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jan; 4(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 10148096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
