These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7874633)

  • 1. Total hip replacement: the case for noncemented femoral fixation because of age.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Tugwell PS; Wong C; Bullas R
    Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 7874633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
    D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):212-23. PubMed ID: 9917606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The case for cementing all femoral components in total hip replacement.
    Harris WH
    Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S55-60. PubMed ID: 7874631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixation of the acetabular component. The case for cement.
    Ranawat CS; Peters LE; Umlas ME
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):207-15. PubMed ID: 9372772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial comparing cemented to cementless total hip replacement in 250 osteoarthritic patients: the impact on health related quality of life and cost effectiveness.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
    Iowa Orthop J; 1994; 14():108-14. PubMed ID: 7719764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total hip replacement in the elderly: cost-effective alternatives.
    Evans BG; Salvati EA
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():359-65. PubMed ID: 9097165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Mulliken BD; Nayak N; Laupacis A; Tugwell P; Feeney D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):330-44. PubMed ID: 8998896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Perioperative cost analysis of cemented versus uncemented total hip endoprostheses for clinical and economic management. Postoperative follow-up study over one year].
    Könning H; Ackermann B; Seifert T; Wirth CJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 9499512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term clinical results of cemented revision of primary cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Diekerhof CH; Barnaart LF; Rozing PM
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2000 Oct; 66(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 11103490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The rationale for cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Evans BG; Salvati EA; Huo MH; Huk OL
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):599-610. PubMed ID: 8414425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival of cemented total hip replacements.
    Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10149551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior approach to total hip replacement: surgical technique and clinical results of our first one thousand cases using non-cemented prostheses.
    Keggi KJ; Huo MH; Zatorski LE
    Yale J Biol Med; 1993; 66(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 8209560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life.
    Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):156-64. PubMed ID: 8118970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Iorio R; Healy WL; Presutti AH
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 18534542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term survival of the T-28 versus the TR-28 cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Meding JB; Nassif JM; Ritter MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):928-33. PubMed ID: 11061455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of noncemented revision.
    Dorr LD
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jan; 4(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 10148096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.