These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7874875)

  • 1. Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs.
    Gilboy E; Sopena JM; Clifton C; Frazier L
    Cognition; 1995 Feb; 54(2):131-67. PubMed ID: 7874875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.
    Carreiras M; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 4)():353-72. PubMed ID: 8072346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Another word on parsing relative clauses: eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English.
    Carreiras M; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):826-33. PubMed ID: 10540811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Oct; 38(5):491-509. PubMed ID: 19377881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is There a Particular RC Attachment Preference in Turkish? Negotiating the Effects of Semantic Factors.
    Başer Z; Hohenberger A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Aug; 49(4):511-539. PubMed ID: 32189183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish.
    Carreiras M; Salillas E; Barber H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 15130594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Syntactic and Semantic Influences on the Time Course of Relative Clause Processing: The Role of Language Dominance.
    Stern MC; Stover L; Guerra E; Martohardjono G
    Brain Sci; 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34439608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Searching High and Low: Prosodic Breaks Disambiguate Relative Clauses.
    Fromont LA; Soto-Faraco S; Biau E
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():96. PubMed ID: 28203214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral and neural evidence on the processing of ambiguous adjective-noun dependencies in Korean sentence comprehension.
    Nam Y; Hong U
    Brain Lang; 2019 Jan; 188():28-41. PubMed ID: 30557776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Highs and Lows in English Attachment.
    Grillo N; Costa J; Fernandes B; Santi A
    Cognition; 2015 Nov; 144():116-22. PubMed ID: 26266518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism.
    Gibson E; Pearlmutter N; Canseco-Gonzalez E; Hickok G
    Cognition; 1996 Apr; 59(1):23-59. PubMed ID: 8857470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimization of dependency length in written English.
    Temperley D
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):300-33. PubMed ID: 17074312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.
    Staub A; Clifton C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36. PubMed ID: 16569157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension.
    Speer SR; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):965-78. PubMed ID: 9796230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and Mandarin.
    Gelman SA; Tardif T
    Cognition; 1998 Jun; 66(3):215-48. PubMed ID: 9689770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities.
    Kurtzman HS; MacDonald MC
    Cognition; 1993 Sep; 48(3):243-79. PubMed ID: 8269698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences: evidence from semantic priming.
    Nicol JL; Pickering MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1993 Mar; 22(2):207-37. PubMed ID: 8366476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 11873857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.