These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 787506)

  • 1. A study of distortion and surface hardness of improved artificial stone casts.
    Kaiser DA; Nicholls JI
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Oct; 36(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 787506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for making casts from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Steas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):454-6. PubMed ID: 2056470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution.
    Abdullah MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts.
    Cullen DR; Mikesell JW; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 1774689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A universal boxing procedure: irreversible hydrocolloid and magnetic strip.
    NaBadalung DP; Connelly ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 9710834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of a hydrophilic irreversible hydrocolloid/silicone impression material.
    Davis DR; Preble JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 3514871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions.
    Cooney JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)].
    Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does 6 Hours of Contact With Alginate Impression Material Affect Dental Cast Properties?
    Ibrahim AA; Alhajj MN; Khalifa N; Gilada MW
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Jun; 38(6):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28586232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.