These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dental amalgam: hero or villain? Porter KH; Gordon AA Gen Dent; 1988; 36(4):320-1. PubMed ID: 3166436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bell system: direct resin methodology. Davis MW Dent Today; 2001 Feb; 20(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 12524857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of severe posterior interproximal caries with a combined glass ionomer-amalgam restoration: a case report. Brackett WW; Stavely TL J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 77(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 9520758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars. Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State of the art of tooth-colored restoratives. Lutz F Oper Dent; 1996; 21(6):237-48. PubMed ID: 9227118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study. Mjör IA; Reep RL; Kubilis PS; Mondragón BE Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 9863449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Amalgam. XIII. Criticism on dental amalgam: right or wrong?]. Admiraal WJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Mar; 101(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 11830957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Amalgam. XVII. Associations between views on dental amalgam and other variables]. Schuurs AH; Eijkman MA; Hoogstraten J Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Aug; 101(8):305-8. PubMed ID: 11831157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite. Olmez A; Ulusu T Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of occlusal amalgam margin angle and clinical appearance of amalgam restorations. Brackett WW; Browning WD; Moore DS; Gilpatrick RO; Johnson WW J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 79(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 10726575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations. Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]