These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7876434)

  • 1. Force threshold for hearing by direct bone conduction.
    Carlsson P; Håkansson B; Ringdahl A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1124-9. PubMed ID: 7876434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a Novel Bone Conduction Verification Tool Using a Surface Microphone: Validation With Percutaneous Bone Conduction Users.
    Hodgetts W; Scott D; Maas P; Westover L
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1157-1164. PubMed ID: 29578886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and precision of direct bone conduction measurements.
    Sadeghi AM; Flynn M; Davison T; Schulte M; Hillbratt M
    B-ENT; 2016; 12(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27097393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prescriptive amplification recommendations for hearing losses with a conductive component and their impact on the required maximum power output: an update with accompanying clinical explanation.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):452-60. PubMed ID: 23886423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds.
    Chordekar S; Perez R; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():59-67. PubMed ID: 29678325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction.
    Håkansson B; Tjellström A; Rosenhall U
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 6719012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceleration levels at hearing threshold with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction.
    Håkansson B; Tjellström A; Rosenhall U
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 100(3-4):240-52. PubMed ID: 4061074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maturation of Mechanical Impedance of the Skin-Covered Skull: Implications for Soft Band Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems Fitted in Infants and Young Children.
    Mackey AR; Hodgetts WE; Scott D; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e210-23. PubMed ID: 26828790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone conduction implants for amplification: comparison of results.
    Hough DA; Matthews P; Hough JV
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Dec; 76(12):857, 861-2, 864-5. PubMed ID: 9431774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefit of a new hearing device utilizing cartilage conduction.
    Nishimura T; Hosoi H; Saito O; Miyamae R; Shimokura R; Matsui T; Iwakura T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Oct; 40(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 23395550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Novel Method to Determine the Maximum Output of Individual Patients for an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Using Clinical Routine Data.
    Ghoncheh M; Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):219-226. PubMed ID: 37580866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Candidature for hearing aids: justification for the concept and a two-part audiometric criterion.
    Haggard M; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Oct; 27(5):303-18. PubMed ID: 8205076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds.
    Ishida IM; Cuthbert BP; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 21206364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Bone anchored hearing aids (B.A.H.A.)].
    Schüpbach J; Kompis M; Häusler R
    Ther Umsch; 2004 Jan; 61(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 14997999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.