120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7876440)
1. Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid.
Robinson K; Gatehouse S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1183-90. PubMed ID: 7876440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.
Gatehouse S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1258-68. PubMed ID: 1401514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.
Ito A; Fukuda S; Shimozawa M; Abe K; Kumada J; Nakaya M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Feb; 50(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 35643884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of binaural interference in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
Allen RL; Schwab BM; Cranford JL; Carpenter MD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Oct; 11(9):494-500. PubMed ID: 11057734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing.
Florentine M
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1375-9. PubMed ID: 6643849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.
Gustafsson HA; Arlinger SD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):518-29. PubMed ID: 8120263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study.
Gantz BJ; Perkins R; Murray M; Levy SC; Puria S
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):352-359. PubMed ID: 28005723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Monaurally Fitted Hearing Aid Use on the Evolution of Presbycusis.
Dunya G; Najem F; Mailhac A; Abou Rizk S; Bassim M
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Sep; 130(9):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 33615825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in the Elderly].
von Gablenz P; Holube I
Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Nov; 96(11):759-764. PubMed ID: 29132188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
Zhang J; McPherson B
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
Dillon H
J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
He LP
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
