These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7877789)

  • 1. U.S. Supreme Court decision: six months later.
    Ohio Nurses Rev; 1995; 70(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 7877789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. Supreme Court decision of N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
    Pendergast J; Wagner B
    Stat; 1994 Jul; 63(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 8029822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.
    Cornu-Quinn C
    Am Nurse; 1994; 26(7):5, 28. PubMed ID: 8067641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Employers use Supreme Court decision against RNs; ANA devises legal, legislative strategies.
    Ketter J
    Am Nurse; 1994 Oct; 26(9):1, 7. PubMed ID: 7985865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court says nurses may be supervisors.
    Hawaii Nurse (Honol); 1995 Mar; 2(3):5. PubMed ID: 7546184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
    N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supreme Court rules NLRB erred re "supervisory nurses".
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):1. PubMed ID: 8066179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
    Oreg Nurse; 1994 Dec; 59(4):suppl E1. PubMed ID: 7724201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seventh circuit appeals court rules that LPNs are not supervisors.
    Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Mar; 7(6):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 10387722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court overrules NLRB: 'supervisory' LPNs cannot be unionized.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 May; 46(12):1. PubMed ID: 16784003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying a deprivation of liberty.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2016 Jan; 21(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 26692137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Nursing Home Reform Act.
    Maben PA
    Kans Med; 1990 Oct; 91(10):254-7. PubMed ID: 2273712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Punitive damages in lawsuits against nursing homes.
    Scott EJ
    J Leg Med; 2002 Mar; 23(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 11957327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Drum beat in Münster: social court declares nursing care grades unlawful: six! Sit down!].
    Heinemeyer C
    Pflege Z; 2010 Oct; 63(10):582-3. PubMed ID: 20960724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HHS sued over preadmission screening.
    Geriatr Nurs; 1989; 10(4):174. PubMed ID: 2777112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meeting the expectations of OBRA.
    Holder EL
    J Aging Soc Policy; 1991; 3(1-2):13-20. PubMed ID: 10186775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses 'disturbed' by new regulations.
    Occup Health Saf; 1989 Mar; 58(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 2710464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Living with OBRA--nutritional assessment and review.
    Matthews LE
    J Nutr Elder; 1993; 12(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 8277417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The definition for licensure purposes of nursing homes and homes for the aged.
    UNDERWOOD B
    Hosp Manage; 1960 Jul; 90():40-1. PubMed ID: 13840362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. After long delay, federal regulations for enforcing nursing home standards may be issued this year.
    Skolnick AA
    JAMA; 1993 May; 269(18):2348-9, 2353. PubMed ID: 8479052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.