207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7878300)
1. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.
Leslie KO; Rosai J
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma.
Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.
Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists.
Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.
Qu Z; Ninan S; Almosa A; Chang KG; Kuruvilla S; Nguyen N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 17509987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for the reporting of gastric carcinoma.
Robert ME; Lamps L; Lauwers GY;
Hum Pathol; 2008 Jan; 39(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17967475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of placental pathology reports.
Khong TY; Gordijn SJ
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2003; 6(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 12370768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A synoptic reporting system for peripheral blood smear interpretation.
Jaso J; Nguyen A; Nguyen AN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 135(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 21350088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The time is now. Checklists for surgical pathology reports.
Kempson RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1107-8. PubMed ID: 1444735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
Hammond EH; Flinner RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Standards, options and recommendations for the composition of anatomic and surgical pathology reports or cytopathology reports in oncology].
Arnould L; Fiche M; Blanc-Vincent MP; Le Doussal V; Signal-Zafrani B; Gory-Delaboere G; Briffod M; Vielh P; Voigt JJ;
Ann Pathol; 2003 Feb; 23(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 12743509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
