87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7878577)
1. [Problems raised by the conducting and interpretation of meta-analysis].
Vital Durand D
Therapie; 1994; 49(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 7878577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
Donner A; Klar N
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Advantages of meta-analysis of clinical trials].
Boissel JP
Therapie; 1994; 49(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 7878576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of small trials: proceed with caution.
Farkouh ME; Fuster V
Nat Clin Pract Nephrol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):115. PubMed ID: 18326067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Meta-analysis of therapeutic trials. Risk of underestimating specific effects].
Norlin K
Lakartidningen; 1999 May; 96(19):2332. PubMed ID: 10377677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: how to separate the good grain from the chaff].
Pignon JP
Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):697-9. PubMed ID: 10507851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Meta-analysis as a tool for gaining knowledge].
Koch A; Ziegler S
Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):83-90. PubMed ID: 10851854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Lying with statistics: meta-analysis].
Ziegler A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Nov; 134(48):2469-70. PubMed ID: 19924614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of published data using a linear mixed-effects model.
Stram DO
Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 8672702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Meta-studies--a solution for the quantity of literature in ophthalmology?].
Bialasiewicz AA
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 May; 208(5):A1. PubMed ID: 8766021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A practical guide to meta-analysis.
Chung KC; Burns PB; Kim HM
J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Dec; 31(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 17145390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
DerSimonian R
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.
Cooper H; Patall EA
Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 19485627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: uses and pitfalls].
Boissel JP
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):759-70. PubMed ID: 18225428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A meta-analytic approach to determine the state of the science on implant dentistry.
Proskin HM; Jeffcoat RL; Catlin A; Campbell J; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():11-8. PubMed ID: 18437789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).
Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA
Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical trial quality needs to be improved to facilitate metaanalyses.
Chalmers TC
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Sep; Doc No 89():[1541 words; 14 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
