These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7878580)

  • 1. [Value and limits of conventional or cumulative meta analysis in obstetrics and gynecology].
    Subtil D; Truffert P; Vinatier D; Puech F; Querleu D; Crepin G
    Therapie; 1994; 49(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 7878580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Meta-analysis as a synthesis of clinical and epidemiologic information. Its application to treatments in gynecology and obstetrics].
    Vinatier D; Jenicek M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(4):401-13. PubMed ID: 2199561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews of medical evidence: the use of meta-analysis in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Peipert JF; Bracken MB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 9083325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agreement studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: inappropriateness, controversies and consequences.
    Costa Santos C; Costa Pereira A; Bernardes J
    BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):667-9. PubMed ID: 15842294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Meta-analyses of randomized trials in oncology: pros and cons].
    Hill C; Pignon JP
    Bull Cancer; 1999 Mar; 86(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 10210759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Value of the Cochrane Collaboration: the point of view of meta-analysis practitioner].
    Pignon JP
    Therapie; 1996; 51(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 8881118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of meta-analyses and of large randomized trials in the study of cancer treatments.
    Pignon JP; Auperin A; Borget I; Hill C
    Lung Cancer; 2009 Jul; 65(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19059671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology.
    White AA; Pichert JW; Bledsoe SH; Irwin C; Entman SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1031-8. PubMed ID: 15863541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physicians' knowledge, attitudes and professional use of RCTs and meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
    De Vito C; Nobile CG; Furnari G; Pavia M; De Giusti M; Angelillo IF; Villari P
    Eur J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 19(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 19129347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].
    Fodor J; Polgár C; Németh G
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(28):1551-5. PubMed ID: 10957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
    Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of rare events: an update and sensitivity analysis of cardiovascular events in randomized trials of rosiglitazone.
    Dahabreh IJ; Economopoulos K
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 18375649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Betamethasone compared with dexamethasone for preterm birth: a call for trials.
    Murphy KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 17601889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
    Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.