These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7879526)
41. One-day detection of PCR amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in clinical samples: ELISA versus Southern blot hybridisation. Roymans RT; Onland G; Postma BH J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jul; 49(7):581-3. PubMed ID: 8813959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A new gold standard for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis? Monif GR Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 9678147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Application of an automatic nucleic acid extraction method to improve the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis]. Piñeiro L; Vicente D; Echeverría MJ; Cilla G Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2009 Nov; 27(9):549-50. PubMed ID: 19406530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the population of Madrid, detected by a nucleic acid amplification technique]. Cacho J; Díez-Ferrero P; Martínez-Zapico R; Sánchez-Concheiro M Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2005 Jan; 23(1):47. PubMed ID: 15701337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Issues in Chlamydia trachomatis testing by nucleic acid amplification test. Hadgu A J Infect Dis; 2006 May; 193(9):1335-6; author reply 1338-9. PubMed ID: 16586375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical specimens in Brazil. Lima HE; Oliveira MB; Valente BG; Afonso DA; Darocha WD; Souza MC; Alvim TC; Barbosa-Stancioli EF; Noronha FS Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Sep; 34(9):709-17. PubMed ID: 17414937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of nucleic acid hybridization with enzyme immunoassay and isolation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Tuokko H; Ruuska P; Hyypiä T Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Apr; 8(4):320-1. PubMed ID: 2497010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A principle of quality assessment using a competitive polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens. Lichtinghagen R; Glaubitz R Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 Sep; 34(9):765-70. PubMed ID: 8891531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The 7.5-kb plasmid present in Chlamydia trachomatis is not essential for the growth of this microorganism. Peterson EM; Markoff BA; Schachter J; de la Maza LM Plasmid; 1990 Mar; 23(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 2362949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction. Dutilh B; Bébéar C; Rodriguez P; Vekris A; Bonnet J; Garret M Res Microbiol; 1989 Jan; 140(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 2748993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Does digital vaginal examination using lubricant have an impact on testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction? Uribasterra P; Creinin MD; Wiesenfeld HC Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Feb; 29(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 11818897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in swab specimens by the Hybrid Capture II and PACE 2 nucleic acid probe tests. Modarress KJ; Cullen AP; Jaffurs WJ; Troutman GL; Mousavi N; Hubbard RA; Henderson S; Lörincz AT Sex Transm Dis; 1999 May; 26(5):303-8. PubMed ID: 10333286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]