102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7880555)
1. Facility-based inreach strategies to promote annual mammograms.
Mayer JA; Clapp EJ; Bartholomew S; offer J
Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 7880555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Annual return rates to mammography facilities by women age 50 and older.
Clapp EJ; Mayer JA
Radiol Manage; 1994; 16(3):55-8. PubMed ID: 10136194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.
Engelman KK; Ellerbeck EF; Mayo MS; Markello SJ; Ahluwalia JS
Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 15313088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.
Reeves MJ; Remington PL
Prev Med; 1999 Sep; 29(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 10479608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing compliance with mammography recommendations: health assessment forms.
Yarnall KS; Michener JL; Broadhead WE; Tse CK
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jan; 36(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 8419505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening mammography participation and invitational strategy: the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program, 1998-2000.
Jean S; Major D; Rochette L; Brisson J
Chronic Dis Can; 2005; 26(2-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 16251010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a computerized physician reminder and a mailed patient reminder on influenza immunizations for older patients.
Gill JM; Saldarriaga AM
Del Med J; 2000 Oct; 72(10):425-30. PubMed ID: 11085020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personal contact from friends to increase mammography usage.
Calle EE; Miracle-McMahill HL; Moss RE; Heath CW
Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 7880557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; McQuillen D; Martin D; Maraj M
Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 10564629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient reminder letters to promote annual mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.
Mayer JA; Lewis EC; Slymen DJ; Dullum J; Kurata H; Holbrook A; Elder JP; Williams SJ
Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 11006056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.
Kiefe CI; McKay SV; Halevy A; Brody BA
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jun; 154(11):1217-24. PubMed ID: 8203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective.
McCarthy BD; Yood MU; MacWilliam CH; Lee MJ
Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 8777073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan.
Davis NA; Nash E; Bailey C; Lewis MJ; Rimer BK; Koplan JP
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 9236968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
