BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7881083)

  • 1. [Radiation exposure of radiologists during angiography: dose measurements outside the lead apron].
    Fischer H; Przetak C; Teubert G; Ewen K; Mödder U
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 7881083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing doses to interventional radiologists using a personal dosimeter worn over a protective apron.
    Stranden E; Widmark A; Sekse T
    Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 18415785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Staff radiation doses to the lower extremities in interventional radiology.
    Shortt CP; Al-Hashimi H; Malone L; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(6):1206-9. PubMed ID: 17533541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interventional radiologists: occupational radiation doses and risks.
    Niklason LT; Marx MV; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):729-33. PubMed ID: 8497622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indicators for the finger doses in interventional radiology.
    Stranden E; Seske T; Widmark A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 17525057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective dose to staff from interventional procedures: estimations from single and double dosimetry.
    Kuipers G; Velders XL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 19689952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finger doses during interventional radiology: the value of flexible protective gloves.
    Vehmas T
    Rofo; 1991 May; 154(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 1852049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Luska G
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
    Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occupational exposure doses in interventional procedures in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    Bašić B; Beganović A; Skopljak-Beganović A; Samek D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):501-4. PubMed ID: 21138927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation exposure to patients and radiologists during interventional procedures.
    Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E; Karlatira M; Gotzamani-Psarrakou A; Koulouris Ch; Siountas A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):86-9. PubMed ID: 21765154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
    von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units.
    Bor D; Toklu T; Olğar T; Sancak T; Cekirge S; Onal B; Bilgiç S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 16718424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evolution of radiation exposure to operator in diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures and reduction of radiation exposure to operator with protective device].
    Iida H; Horii J; Chabatake M; Mizushima T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1713-22. PubMed ID: 15614223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology: simulations.
    Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):36-8. PubMed ID: 18283062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
    Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose rates in nuclear medicine and the effectiveness of lead aprons: updating the department's knowledge on old and new procedures.
    Young AM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Mar; 34(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 23353888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effective dose and dose to the crystalline lens during angiographic procedures].
    Pages J
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun; 83(3):108-10. PubMed ID: 11025920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.