These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7881084)

  • 1. [Comparison of input grey values and contrast profiles: a contribution to the discussion on optimization of evaluation parameters in storage phosphorus radiography].
    Schätzl M; Fink U
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7881084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
    Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography of the chest by self-scanning linear diode arrays.
    Slasky BS; Sashin D; Horton JA; Sternglass EJ; Bron KM; Deutsch M; Herron JM; Kennedy WH; Boyer JW; Girdany BR
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 2958064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H; Chapot C
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
    Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality criteria in cardiology.
    Bernardi G; Padovani R; Spedicato L; Desmet W; Malisan MR; Giannuleas JD; Neofotistou E; Manginas A; Olivari Z; Cosgrave J; Alfonso F; Bosmans H; Dowling A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):102-6. PubMed ID: 16461497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Multilevel structure isolation using modules based on the example of thoracic radiography].
    Desaga JF; Dengler J; Meinzer HP
    Rofo; 1986 Dec; 145(6):718-21. PubMed ID: 3025963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital luminescence radiography. A new method of study in thoracic diagnosis at the intensive care unit].
    Witte G; Pothmann W; Bause H; Nicolas V; Schulte am Esch J; Bücheler E
    Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.