These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7881223)

  • 21. Are new test methods accurate predictors of gowns' protective barrier effectiveness?
    Belkin NL
    AORN J; 1994 Apr; 59(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 8210247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reduction of methyl parathion residues on clothing by delayed field re-entry and laundering.
    Finley EL; Graves JB; Hewitt FC; Morris HF; Harmon CW; Iddings FA; Schilling PE; Koonce KL
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1979 Jul; 22(4-5):590-7. PubMed ID: 486760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Penetration of soil dust through woven and nonwoven fabrics.
    Kawar NS; Gunther FA; Serat WF; Iwata Y
    J Environ Sci Health B; 1978; 13(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 712037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methyl parathion residue retained in fabrics for functional clothing resulting from use of cationic fabric softeners in laundering.
    Laughlin J; Gold RE
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1990 May; 44(5):737-43. PubMed ID: 2344479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. American standards for UV-protective textiles.
    Hatch KL
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2002; 160():42-7. PubMed ID: 12079236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a passive method for determining particle penetration through protective clothing materials.
    Jaques PA; Portnoff L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Dec; 14(12):995-1002. PubMed ID: 28699827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methyl parathion removal from denim fabrics by selected laundry procedures.
    Easley CB; Laughlin JM; Gold RE; Tupy DR
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1981 Jul; 27(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 7296027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protective barriers and gown design.
    Belkin NL
    Am J Infect Control; 1996 Jun; 24(3):222. PubMed ID: 8807003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Apparel textiles and sun protection: a marketing opportunity or a quality control nightmare?
    Pailthorpe M
    Mutat Res; 1998 Nov; 422(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 9920443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of gravimetric and gas chromatographic methods for assessing performance of textile materials against liquid pesticide penetration.
    Shaw A; Abbi R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2004; 10(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 15377410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of the pig as a bioassay substrate for evaluation of thermal protective clothing and physical sensor calibration.
    Knox FS; McCahan GR; Wachtel TL
    Aerosp Med; 1974 Aug; 45(8):933-8. PubMed ID: 4844253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lasting Protection.
    Laws J
    Occup Health Saf; 2016 May; 85(5):52-5. PubMed ID: 27311208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Multifaceted Evaluation on the Penetration Resistance of Protective Clothing Fabrics against Viral Liquid Drops without Pressure.
    Shimasaki N; Okaue A; Morimoto M; Uchida Y; Koshiba T; Tsunoda K; Arakawa S; Shinohara K
    Biocontrol Sci; 2020; 25(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 32173667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are new test methods accurate predictors of gowns' protective barrier effectiveness?
    Stull JO
    AORN J; 1994 Jul; 60(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 8085801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Hygienic evaluation and improvement of waterproof protective clothing for mining].
    Itkin MZ; Glod AN; Bondarenko AT; Ovcharenko VL
    Gig Sanit; 1973 Feb; 38(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 4779863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bacterial penetration vis-á-vis lint generation.
    Belkin NL
    J Hosp Infect; 2002 Dec; 52(4):315-7. PubMed ID: 12473481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Starch as a renewable finish to improve the pesticide-protective properties of conventional workclothes.
    Obendorf SK; Kasunick RS; Ravichandran V; Borsa J; Coffman CW
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1991 Jul; 21(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 1898107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The evaluation of bacteria penetration by medical textiles for multiple use and disposable multilayer surgical drapes, according to the PN-EN ISO 22610 standard].
    Zareba T; Zawistowska A; Kruszewska H; Mrówka A; Tyski S
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2012; 64(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 23285781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Toxicity of N-methyl-4-methoxynaphthalimide, a fluorescent whitening agent.
    Otake T; Aburada S; Nishimura H; Nakamura S; Ugawa M; Takagi Y; Akasaka S; Ikegami N
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1987 Jan; 16(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 3813655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A hygienic study of new fabrics and models for ordinary work clothing for healthy workers].
    Uzunova S
    Probl Khig; 1992; 17():163-77. PubMed ID: 1364538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.