These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7881333)

  • 1. A parametric finite element analysis study of the stresses in an endosseous implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 7881333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.
    Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8752556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.
    Clelland NL; Ismail YH; Zaki HS; Pipko D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 1820307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 16198168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems.
    Baiamonte T; Abbate MF; Pizzarello F; Lozada J; James R
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 9151632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative histologic evaluation of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Kent JN
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 6863353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae.
    Benzing UR; Gall H; Weber H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 7744438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of a hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone.
    Abu-Hammad OA; Harrison A; Williams D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10960990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
    Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades.
    Valen M
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 6368845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.