These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7881333)

  • 21. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of core thickness on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis.
    Proos KA; Swain MV; Ironside J; Steven GP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 14651230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants--a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study].
    Mailath G; Stoiber B; Watzek G; Matejka M
    Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 2638071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
    Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns with varying core elastic moduli.
    Lee SK; Wilson PR
    Aust Dent J; 2000 Jun; 45(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 10925505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of implant geometry on the stress distribution around dental implants.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 7107655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants.
    Kohal RJ; Papavasiliou G; Kamposiora P; Tripodakis A; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11951811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Sertgöz A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 16198407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.