These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7883428)

  • 41. Cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in pregnancy.
    Yoonessi M; Wieckowska W; Mariniello D; Antkowiak J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1982 Apr; 20(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 6125429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterization and clinical management of abnormal cytology findings in pregnant women: a retrospective analysis.
    Freudenreich R; Weiss M; Engler T; Neis F; Henes M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Dec; 306(6):2017-2026. PubMed ID: 35976386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cervical neoplasia in pregnancy. Part 1: screening and management of preinvasive disease.
    Hunter MI; Monk BJ; Tewari KS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 199(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18585520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cervical cancer screening in pregnancy.
    Stonehocker J
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Jun; 40(2):269-82. PubMed ID: 23732031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Conservative management of intraepithelial cervical neoplasia.
    Lickrish GM; Fortier M
    Can Med Assoc J; 1977 Mar; 116(6):641-3. PubMed ID: 608164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women.
    Yamazaki T; Inaba F; Takeda N; Furuno M; Kamemori T; Kosaka N; Ohta Y; Fukasawa I; Inaba N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 273(6):355-9. PubMed ID: 16208482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retrospective evaluation of CO(2) laser conization in pregnant women with carcinoma in situ or microinvasive carcinoma.
    Tsuritani M; Watanabe Y; Kotani Y; Kataoka T; Ueda H; Hoshiai H
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 68(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 19752561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Management and course of histologically verified cervical carcinoma in situ during pregnancy.
    Ackermann S; Gehrsitz C; Mehlhorn G; Beckmann MW
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1134-7. PubMed ID: 16929422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: a multi-institutional evaluation.
    Fader AN; Alward EK; Niederhauser A; Chirico C; Lesnock JL; Zwiesler DJ; Guido RS; Lofgren DJ; Gold MA; Moore KN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):113.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20522409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
    Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison between abnormal cytology, colposcopy and histopathology during pregnancy.
    Lundvall L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1989; 68(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 2520791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does mode of delivery impact the course of cervical dysplasia in pregnancy? A review of 219 cases.
    Bracic T; Reich O; Taumberger N; Tamussino K; Trutnovsky G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jul; 274():13-18. PubMed ID: 35561565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with cervical neoplasia.
    Veridiano NP; Delke I; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Aug; 58(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 7254730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
    Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
    J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy vs dynamic spectral imaging directed biopsy in correctly identifying the grade of cervical dysplasia in women undergoing conization: A methodological study.
    Booth BB; Petersen LK; Blaakaer J; Johansen T; Mertz H; Dahl K; Bor P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Aug; 99(8):1064-1070. PubMed ID: 32105344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 99: management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 112(6):1419-1444. PubMed ID: 19037054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Assessment of positive cytologic and/or colposcopic findings in the uterine cervix in pregnancy].
    Goebe L; Link M; Justus J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 May; 48(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 3396833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy.
    Harper DM; Roach MS
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Jan; 42(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8537809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Colposcopy and directed biopsy reliability during pregnancy: a cohort study.
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Philippe E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Sep; 62(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7493705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.