These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7883873)

  • 1. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.
    Huang LU; Chen CH; Chou CF; Lu JJ; Chi WM; Lee WH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2001 Oct; 64(10):568-74. PubMed ID: 11791943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
    el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of methods for the identification of the most common yeasts in the clinical microbiology laboratory].
    Guelfand L; Grisolía P; Bozzano C; Kaufman S
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12833681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of RapID yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Stockman L; Roberts G; Pincus D; Pollack J; Marler J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Apr; 36(4):883-6. PubMed ID: 9542903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The medically important yeasts present in clinical specimens.
    Al-Hedaithy SS
    Ann Saudi Med; 1992 Jan; 12(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17589130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.
    Szabó Z; Tóth B; Kovács M; Kardos G; Maráz A; Rozgonyi F; Majoros L
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 18322057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Yeast Identification panel.
    St Germain G; Beauchesne D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2296-9. PubMed ID: 1939587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter study evaluating the Vitek MS system for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Westblade LF; Jennemann R; Branda JA; Bythrow M; Ferraro MJ; Garner OB; Ginocchio CC; Lewinski MA; Manji R; Mochon AB; Procop GW; Richter SS; Rychert JA; Sercia L; Burnham CA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 51(7):2267-72. PubMed ID: 23658267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.