These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7884763)

  • 1. Pitfalls in the interpretation of studies: I.
    Appleton DR
    J R Soc Med; 1995 Jan; 88(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 7884763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pros and cons of noninferiority trials.
    Pocock SJ
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 17(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 12914552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pitfall in the use of the Altman nomogram for power estimation.
    Evans MJ; Harrison CA; Mapleson WW
    Br J Anaesth; 1996 Feb; 76(2):334. PubMed ID: 8777130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology.
    Carroll K; Milsted B; Lewis JA
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2771-4; author reply 2774-8. PubMed ID: 15316946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample calculation for split-mouth designs.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):818-9. PubMed ID: 22640684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pitfalls in the interpretation of studies: III.
    Appleton DR
    J R Soc Med; 1995 May; 88(5):241-3. PubMed ID: 7636813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design of controlled clinical trials for diabetic polyneuropathy.
    Sima AA; Laudadio C
    Semin Neurol; 1996 Jun; 16(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 8987133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in cluster headache.
    Lipton RB; Micieli G; Russell D; Solomon S; Tfelt-Hansen P; Waldenlind E
    Cephalalgia; 1995 Dec; 15(6):452-62. PubMed ID: 8706107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is human immunodeficiency virus sexual risk prevention intervention effective?
    Solomon B; McGuinn L; Hoerlein M; Basco W; Rowe P; Lehmann H
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Oct; 155(10):1127-30. PubMed ID: 11576007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitfalls of statistical hypothesis testing: multiple testing.
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2014 Aug; 349():g5310. PubMed ID: 25172184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analyses in cancer clinical trials: principles and pitfalls.
    Benson JR; Saeb-Parsy K
    World J Surg; 2006 Jul; 30(7):1177-83. PubMed ID: 16794898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculations in randomized trials: common pitfalls.
    Brasher PM; Brant RF
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 54(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 17272248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical studies and product evaluations: how to maximize their value.
    Bolton L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):88S-95S; discussion 96S. PubMed ID: 7669205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Roaming through methodology. IX. The interpretation of subgroup analyses].
    van der Windt DA; van Poppel MN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(41):2245-7. PubMed ID: 9864501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cautionary note on design implications when the primary analysis is a stratified analysis of a binary endpoint.
    Chuang-Stein C
    Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 17240655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of group sequential methods for binary longitudinal data.
    Spiessens B; Lesaffre E; Verbeke G
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):501-15. PubMed ID: 12590410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding common statistical pitfalls.
    Goldman SB
    J Hand Ther; 2014; 27(3):163-4. PubMed ID: 24100057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple comparisons to both a negative and a positive control.
    Hasler M
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 22232049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.