These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7885819)

  • 41. Effects of spatial-memory decay and dual-task interference on perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions in the absence of online visual feedback.
    Cheng KC; Pratt J; Maki BE
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Apr; 32(2):328-42. PubMed ID: 23635599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The loss of short-term visual representations over time: decay or temporal distinctiveness?
    Mercer T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2281-8. PubMed ID: 25314045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of interference and retention delay on temporal generalization performance.
    Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1903-12. PubMed ID: 20952787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The length of the retention interval, forgetting, and subjective similarity.
    King DL; Jones FL; Pearlman RC; Tishman A; Felix CA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):660-71. PubMed ID: 12109760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Auditory and visual spatial working memory.
    Lehnert G; Zimmer HD
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1080-90. PubMed ID: 17128606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Storage and processing in visuo-spatial working memory.
    Duff SC; Logie RH
    Scand J Psychol; 1999 Dec; 40(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 10658511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 21287315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Consolidation of statistical information of multiple objects in working memory.
    Baijal S; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1733-41. PubMed ID: 21607816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations.
    van Ede F; Niklaus M; Nobre AC
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(2):437-445. PubMed ID: 28077721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1897-1916. PubMed ID: 28600676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Short-term memory for tactile and temporal stimuli in a shared-attention recall task.
    Bowers RL; Mollenhauer MS; Luxford J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):903-13. PubMed ID: 2377426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Visuospatial working memory in Parkinson's disease.
    Bradley VA; Welch JL; Dick DJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1989 Nov; 52(11):1228-35. PubMed ID: 2592967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects.
    Makovski T; Jiang YV
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1132-43. PubMed ID: 18927031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. More is still not better: testing the perturbation model of temporal reference memory across different modalities and tasks.
    Ogden RS; Jones LA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):909-24. PubMed ID: 18785075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):141-71. PubMed ID: 15907778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distinction between perceptual and attentional processing in working memory tasks: a study of phase-locked and induced oscillatory brain dynamics.
    Deiber MP; Missonnier P; Bertrand O; Gold G; Fazio-Costa L; Ibañez V; Giannakopoulos P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):158-72. PubMed ID: 17214572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.