These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7885822)

  • 1. Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.
    Tresilian JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):231-45. PubMed ID: 7885822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension.
    DeLucia PR; Tresilian JR; Meyer LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):552-67. PubMed ID: 10811162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action.
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1990; 19(2):223-39. PubMed ID: 2235289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.
    Baurès R; Maquestiaux F; DeLucia PR; Defer A; Prigent E
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1971-1984. PubMed ID: 29713757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H; Landwehr K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):581-96. PubMed ID: 21264724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is judging time-to-contact based on 'tau'?
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; Trébuchet S; Mestre DR
    Perception; 1996; 25(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 8865299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.
    Tresilian JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):865-76. PubMed ID: 1834797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-to-contact judgment in the locomotion of adults and preschool children.
    Wann JP; Edgar P; Blair D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Oct; 19(5):1053-65. PubMed ID: 8228839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interceptive timing.
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1993; 22(6):653-80. PubMed ID: 8255697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions.
    Tresilian JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 15912877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task.
    DeLucia PR; Liddell GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):901-14. PubMed ID: 9627424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception.
    Bruggeman H; Yonas A; Konczak J
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1420-6. PubMed ID: 17166526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different motion cues are used to estimate time-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories.
    Calabro FJ; Beardsley SA; Vaina LM
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2378-85. PubMed ID: 22056519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The detrimental influence of attention on time-to-contact perception.
    Baurès R; Balestra M; Rosito M; VanRullen R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1591-1598. PubMed ID: 29687355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is spatial judgement of ball trajectories a highly differentiated or hierarchically organized skill?
    Vom Hofe A; Fery YA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1091-6. PubMed ID: 8337051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating methods to measure time-to-contact.
    Lugtigheid AJ; Welchman AE
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(20):2234-41. PubMed ID: 21907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception.
    Marinovic W; Plooy AM; Arnold DH
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():73-8. PubMed ID: 22480880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of body posture on long-range time-to-contact estimation.
    Baurès R; Hecht H
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):674-81. PubMed ID: 21936296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Braking reaching movements: a test of the constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions.
    Hopkins B; Churchill A; Vogt S; Rönnqvist L
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 14766484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.