These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7885823)
81. Note on the rationality of rule-based versus exemplar-based processing in human judgment. Juslin P; Olsson H Scand J Psychol; 2004 Feb; 45(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 15016277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. The challenge of cognitive science for medical diagnosis. Croskerry P; Campbell SG; Petrie DA Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Feb; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 36759370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. The inverse base-rate effect is not explained by eliminative inference. Kruschke JK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1385-400. PubMed ID: 11713874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LATENCY AND REMOTENESS IN PREFERENCE JUDGMENTS. GREENBERG MG; DOREN DG J Exp Psychol; 1965 Aug; 70():182-8. PubMed ID: 14341750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
85. Where is the noise in SDT pain assessment? Coppola R; Gracely RH Pain; 1983 Nov; 17(3):257-266. PubMed ID: 6657286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. The importance of theory: response to Brenner (2000). Wallsten TS; Erev I; Budescu DV Psychol Rev; 2000 Oct; 107(4):947-9. PubMed ID: 11089413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Judgments of weight as affected by adaptation range, adaptation duration, magnitude of unlabeled anchor, and judgmental language. HARVEY OJ; CAMPBELL DT J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jan; 65():12-21. PubMed ID: 13960800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
88. A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Haran U; Moore DA; Morewedge CK Judgm Decis Mak; 2010 Dec; 5(7):467-476. PubMed ID: 28405257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Constructability and the power function for line judgments. Fagot RF Percept Psychophys; 1982 Apr; 31(4):392-4. PubMed ID: 7110894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
91. The effects of social and sensory deprivation on autokinetic judgments. WALTERS RH; QUINN MJ J Pers; 1960 Jun; 28():210-9. PubMed ID: 13842719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
92. The subject effect in judgments of subjective magnitude. JONES FN; MARCUS MJ J Exp Psychol; 1961 Jan; 61():40-4. PubMed ID: 13790519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
93. Accuracy of forecasts in strategic intelligence. Mandel DR; Barnes A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(30):10984-9. PubMed ID: 25024176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Supplementary report: Context effects on absolute judgments of length. MILLER CA; ENGEN T J Exp Psychol; 1960 Apr; 59():276-7. PubMed ID: 14422474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. Improvement in perceptual judgments as a function of controlled practice or training. GIBSON EJ Psychol Bull; 1953 Nov; 50(6):401-31. PubMed ID: 13112332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
97. Sets and subsets in the identification of multidimensional stimuli. Levy RM; Kaufman HM Psychol Rev; 1973 Mar; 80(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 4705830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Juslin P; Winman A; Olsson H Psychol Rev; 2000 Apr; 107(2):384-96. PubMed ID: 10789203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Effects of varied distance on short-range size judgments. JENKIN N J Exp Psychol; 1957 Nov; 54(5):327-31. PubMed ID: 13481277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
100. Some sources of error in half-heaviness judgments. ENGEN T; TULUNAY U J Exp Psychol; 1957 Sep; 54(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 13475648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]