BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7886195)

  • 1. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NY: nurse learns of pt's doubt re surgery site: hospital liabile for operation on wrong hand.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Dec; 44(7):3. PubMed ID: 14730829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does judgment for nurse require judgment for hospital? Case in point: Eversole v. Oklahoma Hosp. Founders (818 P. 2d. 456--OK (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):4. PubMed ID: 1565799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurse changes testimony & notes: credibility issue. Case in point: Georgia Osteopathic Hosp. v. O'Neal (403 S.E. 2d 235--GA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Aug; 32(3):2. PubMed ID: 1924820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wrong meds & death on "life flight": jurisdictional issues. Case in point: Cowart v. Shelby County. Health Care Corp. 911F. Supp. 248--MS (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):4. PubMed ID: 8711112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Did nurse call Dr. twice: did Dr. have duty to check Pt.? Case on point: Stubbs v. Ray, 2000 WL 125325 S.E.2d - GA (2000).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Sep; 41(4):4. PubMed ID: 11995018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doctor sues nurse for falsifying records.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):1. PubMed ID: 3423264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 02 disconnected, pt. misplaced, notes altered & missing. Case in point: Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 661 So. 2d 991--LA (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Dec; 36(7):4. PubMed ID: 8685374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nursing records "missing": spoilation of evidence. Case in point: Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Wash. 881 P. 2d 304--AK (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):2. PubMed ID: 7838971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.