BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7887039)

  • 1. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study.
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt CN; Encke A
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):147-50. PubMed ID: 7552133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"].
    Engert K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs and benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: abdominal wall lifting vs. pneumoperitoneum procedure.
    Ishikawa M; Nakagawa T; Nishioka M; Ogata S; Miyauchi T; Kashiwagi Y; Uemura N; Inoue S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(70):497-500. PubMed ID: 16995448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Swem T; Fazzalari R
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.
    Johansson M; Thune A; Nelvin L; Stiernstam M; Westman B; Lundell L
    Br J Surg; 2005 Jan; 92(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 15584058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature.
    Hüscher CG; Lirici MM; Di Paola M; Crafa F; Napolitano C; Mereu A; Recher A; Corradi A; Amini M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Mar; 17(3):442-51. PubMed ID: 12399846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
    Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Straface S
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: a study of related surgical complications.
    DesCôteaux JG; Poulin EC; Lortie M; Murray G; Gingras S
    Can J Surg; 1995 Dec; 38(6):497-500. PubMed ID: 7497363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Voyles CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Champault A; Vons C; Dagher I; Amerlinck S; Franco D
    Br J Surg; 2002 Dec; 89(12):1602-7. PubMed ID: 12445073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.