BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7888521)

  • 21. [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint].
    Pelz FJ
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):636-9. PubMed ID: 9064938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Clinical pathways and guidelines reflected in malpractice judgment].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):705-7. PubMed ID: 12858866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Liability of the expert witness].
    Jansen C
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):632-5. PubMed ID: 9064937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Status and responsibilities of the expert in malpractice procedures].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 2696707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Bill.
    Frizelle F
    N Z Med J; 2002 Nov; 115(1166):U254. PubMed ID: 12552273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Behavior in cases of medical damage].
    Ratzel R
    Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 2533927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quality assurance in surgical gynecology from the legal viewpoint].
    Ratzel R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):674-5. PubMed ID: 8585364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
    Cyran W
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Super-specialists" and the Bolam test.
    Brahams D
    Med Leg J; 1995; 63 ( Pt 1)():4-5. PubMed ID: 7739419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Not Available].
    Kuball L; Wienke A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Aug; 96(8):552-554. PubMed ID: 28850994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: literature review and role of the expert witness.
    Crosby E
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Mar; 54(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 17331936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Not Available].
    Wienke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 2017 Dec; 142(6):538-540. PubMed ID: 29237217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Delegation of medical responsibilities to non-medical personnel. Options and limits from a legal viewpoint].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Unfallchirurg; 2009 Nov; 112(11):1004-9. PubMed ID: 19902164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The physician and the malpractice accusation].
    Pribilla O
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1988; 46():27-36. PubMed ID: 3178671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Experiences with medical expert committees--procedures in physician malpractice claims].
    Carstensen G
    Versicherungsmedizin; 1989 Mar; 41(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 2705283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Surgical treatment error and problems in its assessment from the legal viewpoint].
    Binder G
    Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(22):1445-9. PubMed ID: 3439380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Fault of organisation in hospital and practice].
    Wienke A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Aug; 85(8):589-92. PubMed ID: 16625489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loss prevention case of the month.
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1992 Nov; 85(11):531. PubMed ID: 1434625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Weber RD
    Mich Med; 1990 Apr; 89(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 2336043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.