382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7888523)
21. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
Deutsch E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Lawyers Choose Specific Experts for Many Different Reasons.
Benumof JL
Anesth Analg; 2016 Jan; 122(1):293. PubMed ID: 26678479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The consumer viewpoint on malpractice.
Flax EM
Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1979 Jul; 1(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 10243997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Delegation of medical responsibilities to non-medical personnel. Options and limits from a legal viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Unfallchirurg; 2009 Nov; 112(11):1004-9. PubMed ID: 19902164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Surgical treatment error and problems in its assessment from the legal viewpoint].
Binder G
Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(22):1445-9. PubMed ID: 3439380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. "Super-specialists" and the Bolam test.
Brahams D
Med Leg J; 1995; 63 ( Pt 1)():4-5. PubMed ID: 7739419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical malpractice: is the testimony expert?
Francis JD
Md Med; 2004; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 15079939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Quality assurance in surgical gynecology from the legal viewpoint].
Ratzel R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):674-5. PubMed ID: 8585364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Legal malpractice problem of guidelines].
Ulsenheimer K
Versicherungsmedizin; 2001 Jun; 53(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 11411316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Malpractice problems in ambulatory surgery].
Ulsenheimer K
Urologe A; 2003 Aug; 42(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 14513228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Endoscopic surgery and malpractice].
Ulsenheimer K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1995; 257(1-4):29-36. PubMed ID: 8579409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Patient education from the legal viewpoint].
Schreiber HL
Internist (Berl); 1983 Apr; 24(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6345433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Liability of the expert witness].
Jansen C
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):632-5. PubMed ID: 9064937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Nursing competence--exemplified by expert assessment of decubitus ulcer prevention].
Jacobs P
Krankenpfl J; 2003; 41(4-6):78-83. PubMed ID: 12929311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ambulatory surgery from the legal medicine viewpoint].
Hiersche HD
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Feb; 54(2):M35-8. PubMed ID: 8174910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Patient awareness during general anesthesia: a legal guide.
Grinblat TS
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):137-67. PubMed ID: 9068240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Treatment errors in breast surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Mosny DS; Nitz U
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 7959311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Status and responsibilities of the expert in malpractice procedures].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 2696707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Everything new in May].
Wienke A; Stenger A; Sailer R
Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Apr; 91(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 22457247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
