These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7891248)

  • 41. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
    Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
    Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
    J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-force periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction.
    Preshaw PM; Kupp L; Hefti AF; Mariotti A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 26(7):434-40. PubMed ID: 10412847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of subgingival calculus on the validity of clinical probing measurements.
    Clerehugh V; Abdeia R; Hull PS
    J Dent; 1996 Sep; 24(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 8916646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Improved diagnostics: clinical evaluation of a color-coded, polymeric periodontal probe.
    Kazmierczak MD; Ciancio SG; Mather M; Dangler LV; Troullos ES
    Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 1521399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Probing bone level measurements for determination of the depths of Class II furcation defects.
    Suh YI; Lundgren T; Sigurdsson T; Riggs M; Crigger M
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jun; 73(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 12083537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: influence of tine shape and probing force.
    Bulthuis HM; Barendregt DS; Timmerman MF; Loos BG; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9650880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Comparative study of the measured values of different periodontal probes].
    Gruber I; Han Y; Sonnabend E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):665-7. PubMed ID: 1817857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Probe penetration in periodontal and peri-implant tissues. An experimental study in the beagle dog.
    Abrahamsson I; Soldini C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17092216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Current interpretations of periodontal probing evaluations: diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
    Greenstein G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Jun; 26(6):381-2, 384, 387-90 passim; quiz 398-9. PubMed ID: 16021957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Periodontal disease progression.
    Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; Proskin H; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2000 Oct; 71(10):1583-90. PubMed ID: 11063391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants.
    Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R; Schotte A; Darius P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 8597621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
    Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
    J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of different diagnostic thresholds on incidence of disease progression.
    Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Reasner DS; Howell TH
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):872-8. PubMed ID: 9736369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
    Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Periodontal probing calibration in an academic setting.
    Drucker SD; Prieto LE; Kao DW
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Nov; 76(11):1466-73. PubMed ID: 23144482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.