These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 789154)

  • 1. Tatum T: experience with 3,000 patients.
    Williamson HO; Bank HL; Kirkland BH
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 789154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical study of a copper IUD, T Cu 200].
    Viollet MF; Cohen J; Merger R
    Gynecologie; 1975 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1095434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of copper-7 intrauterine device in Malaysian women.
    Sivanesaratnam V; Puvan IS; Sinnathuray TA
    Med J Aust; 1975 Aug; 2(8):298-301. PubMed ID: 1165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year evaluation of the Spring Coil IUD in Rijeka, Yugoslavia, and Cairo, Egypt.
    Randic L; Ragab I; Thomas M; Kessel E; Bernard RP
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 1234074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Results of clinical use of different types of intrauterine contraception].
    Manuilova IA; Antipova NB
    Sov Med; 1975 Jun; (6):81-5. PubMed ID: 1099670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience with endouterine Cu T device.
    Gulati B; Nafda K; Mujumdar U
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1975 Oct; 25(5):616-8. PubMed ID: 1228027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of intra-uterine devices, Copper-T-200 and Dana-Super-Fix-Cuprum (author's transl)].
    Melzer H; Heyer E; Hielscher K; Schneider W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1980; 102(22):1283-7. PubMed ID: 7223144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Trutko NS
    Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Tatum-T compared with Copper-7.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1980 Apr; 1(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12278358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical study of the copper intrauterine T contraceptive device].
    Rustrián Azamar A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Sep; 40(239):207-9. PubMed ID: 976763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Intrauterine contraception with Copper-T and Gravigard. A follow-up study from general practice].
    Hellebø R
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1979 Jan; 99(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 760239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Two years use of IUD copper T 200].
    Cohen J; Viollet MR
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1975 Oct; 3(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 1222844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A correlative anatomo-clinical study of the endometrium after removal of intrauterine devices].
    Benay N; Devimes F; Minh HN; Lagrue A
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Jun; 71(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 790516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who will find a perfect IUD?
    People; 1975; 2(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 1164965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experience with the T-CU 200 and 300 intrauterine devices].
    Fugère P; Girard Y; Lemay M
    Union Med Can; 1976 Nov; 105(11):1717-20. PubMed ID: 982699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Personal experiences with the use of intrauterine pessaries].
    Brehm H; Velte A
    Med Welt; 1972 Dec; 23(49):1846-8. PubMed ID: 4646396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The IUD after 20 years: a review.
    Hutchings JE; Benson PJ; Perkin GW; Soderstrom RM
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(6):244-7, 250-5. PubMed ID: 3916184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intrauterine devices--adverse effects and the women's evaluation in 1100 cases].
    Weström L
    Lakartidningen; 1972 Sep; 69(37):4131-5. PubMed ID: 5070398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loop vs. shield: a competing risks analysis of IUD termination.
    Herson J; Crocker CL; Butts E
    Contraception; 1976 Jul; 14(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 975812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.