These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7891642)

  • 1. Scanner-induced variability and quality assurance in longitudinal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements.
    Sievänen H; Oja P; Vuori I
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1795-805. PubMed ID: 7891642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studies.
    Orwoll ES; Oviatt SK; Biddle JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1993 Jun; 8(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 8328311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.
    Hangartner TN
    Osteoporos Int; 2007 Apr; 18(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 17136486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of analytic software and scan analysis technique on the comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry with dual photon absorptiometry of the hip in the elderly.
    Kiel DP; Mercier CA; Dawson-Hughes B; Cali C; Hannan MT; Anderson JJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1130-6. PubMed ID: 7484290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.
    Faulkner KG; McClung MR
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 7492859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
    Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
    Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.
    Orwoll ES; Oviatt SK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Feb; 6(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 2028837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts.
    Lu Y; Mathur AK; Blunt BA; Gluer CC; Will AS; Fuerst TP; Jergas MD; Andriano KN; Cummings SR; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 May; 11(5):626-37. PubMed ID: 9157777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of training syllabi for radiation protection and quality assurance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems.
    O'Connor U; Dowling A; Larkin A; Sheahan N; Gray L; Gallagher A; O'Reilly G; Kosunen A; Zdesar U; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):211-3. PubMed ID: 18397931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An unexpected change in DXA calibration not detected by routine quality control checks.
    Blake GM; Preston NG; Patel R; Herd RJ; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 10367037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-calibration, Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position.
    Jankowski LG; Warner S; Gaither K; Lenchik L; Fan B; Lu Y; Shepherd J
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(4):472-483. PubMed ID: 31558404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis.
    Garland SW; Lees B; Stevenson JC
    Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 9205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in preterm and term infants: evaluation of the methodology.
    Sievänen H; Backström MC; Kuusela AL; Ikonen RS; Mäki M
    Pediatr Res; 1999 Jan; 45(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 9890616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytic and quantitative exposition of patient-specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA-derived in vivo BMD measurements.
    Bolotin HH
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 9507473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-energy bone densitometry using a single 100 ns x-ray pulse.
    Seely JF; Boyer CN; Holland GE
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2027-36. PubMed ID: 9800712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Precision and measurement errors in bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in mass health examination].
    Suzuki T; Shibata H; Moriki H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1994 Oct; 41(10):997-1006. PubMed ID: 7949278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
    Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of bone mineral density and content in rat hindlimb in vitro.
    Sievänen H; Kannus P; Järvinen M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Apr; 9(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 8030435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.