These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7891797)

  • 1. Two-sample hemodialysis urea kinetic modeling: validation of the method.
    Buur T
    Nephron; 1995; 69(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 7891797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children.
    Buur T; Bradbury MG; Smye SW; Brocklebank JT
    Pediatr Nephrol; 1994 Oct; 8(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 7819004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of hemodialysis urea kinetic modeling. Comparison of different models.
    Buur T; Larsson R
    Nephron; 1991; 59(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 1758522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.
    Marshall MR; Golper TA; Shaver MJ; Alam MG; Chatoth DK
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Mar; 39(3):556-70. PubMed ID: 11877575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of postdialysis urea rebound on the quantification of pediatric hemodialysis.
    Marsenić O; Pavlicić D; Bigović G; Peco-Antić A; Jovanović O
    Nephron; 2000 Feb; 84(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 10657712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a modified urea kinetic model direct dialysis quantification and classic urea kinetic modeling.
    Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Giacchino F; Alloatti S
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(3):M798-800. PubMed ID: 8573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urea modeling and Kt/V: a critical appraisal.
    Barth RH
    Kidney Int Suppl; 1993 Jun; 41():S252-60. PubMed ID: 8320932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.
    Lim PS; Lee HP; Kho B; Yu YL; Chang SC; Lin YY; Yang CC; Wang TH; Kuo SY; Lin LC
    Blood Purif; 1999; 17(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 10494022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simplified approach to calculation of V, G, and nPCR for monitoring hemodialysis patients.
    Wharton J; Bailie GR
    Ren Fail; 1994; 16(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 8041967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of dialysis dose on nutritional status of children on chronic hemodialysis.
    Marsenic O; Peco-Antić A; Jovanović O
    Nephron; 2001 Jul; 88(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 11423761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitating hemodialysis: a comparison of three kinetic models.
    Flanigan MJ; Fangman J; Lim VS
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1991 Mar; 17(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 1996572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adequacy of haemodialysis and nutrition in maintenance haemodialysis patients: clinical evaluation of a new on-line urea monitor.
    Chauveau P; Naret C; Puget J; Zins B; Poignet JL
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 8856213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-line dialysate urea monitor: comparison with urea kinetics.
    Alloatti S; Molino A; Manes M; Bonfant G; Bosticardo GM
    Int J Artif Organs; 1995 Sep; 18(9):548-52. PubMed ID: 8582774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group.
    Depner TA; Greene T; Gotch FA; Daugirdas JT; Keshaviah PR; Star RA
    Kidney Int; 1999 Feb; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 9987088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring.
    Wuepper A; Tattersall J; Kraemer M; Wilkie M; Edwards L
    Kidney Int; 2003 Dec; 64(6):2262-71. PubMed ID: 14633151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urea kinetic modeling: an in vitro and in vivo comparative study.
    Gabriel JP; Fellay G; Descombes E
    Kidney Int; 1994 Sep; 46(3):789-96. PubMed ID: 7996801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of adequacy of dialysis in a selected population on CAPD for over 3 years: the influence of urea and creatinine kinetics.
    Selgas R; Bajo MA; Fernandez-Reyes MJ; Bosque E; Lopez-Revuelta K; Jimenez C; Borrego F; de Alvaro F
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1993; 8(11):1244-53. PubMed ID: 8302464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is post-dialysis urea rebound significant with long slow hemodialysis?
    Jean G; Chazot C; Charra B; Terrat JC; Vanel T; Calemard E; Laurent G
    Blood Purif; 1998; 16(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 9736788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. KT/V and protein catabolic rate determination from serial urea measurement in the dialysate effluent stream.
    Garred LJ; DiGiuseppe B; Chand W; McCready W; Canaud B
    Artif Organs; 1992 Jun; 16(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 10078254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient.
    Kloppenburg WD; Stegeman CA; Hooyschuur M; van der Ven J; de Jong PE; Huisman RM
    Kidney Int; 1999 May; 55(5):1961-9. PubMed ID: 10231460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.