These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7892446)

  • 1. Slip-ring and conventional dynamic hepatic CT: contrast material and timing considerations.
    Berland LL
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7892446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
    Foley WD; Hoffmann RG; Quiroz FA; Kahn CE; Perret RS
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM; Roberts SC; Ducic I; Tefft MC; Olson MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of the liver with helical CT: a survey of scanning techniques.
    Silverman PM; Kohan L; Ducic I; Javadi S; Meyer C; Sharma N; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 9423622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography.
    Berland LL; Lee JY
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 3203993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT of the liver: a survey of prevailing methods for administration of contrast material.
    Zeman RK; Clements LA; Silverman PM; Paushter DM; Garra B; Jaffe MH; Clark LR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 3257105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement.
    Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Crowe TM; Gaines MV
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 7724752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dynamic study of the liver with helical scanning: determination of hepatic contrast enhancement in routine studies].
    Uchida M; Edamitsu O; Chang Y; Nishimura H; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 56(7):502-6. PubMed ID: 8692667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen.
    Zeman RK; Fox SH; Silverman PM; Davros WJ; Carter LM; Griego D; Weltman DI; Ascher SM; Cooper CJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Apr; 160(4):719-25. PubMed ID: 8456652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of varying rates of low-osmolarity contrast media injection for hepatic CT: correlation with indocyanine green transit time.
    Harmon BH; Berland LL; Lee JY
    Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 1620831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic hepatic CT.
    Foley WD
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):617-22. PubMed ID: 2916011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement.
    Silverman PM; Roberts S; Tefft MC; Brown B; Fox SH; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of the time to peak hepatic enhancement to optimize contrast-enhanced spiral CT.
    Irie T; Suzuki S; Yamauchi T; Kusano S
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 7710795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement.
    Paushter DM; Zeman RK; Scheibler ML; Choyke PL; Jaffe MH; Clark LR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 2783503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.
    Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM; Dodd GD; Miller WJ
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):721-5. PubMed ID: 8115618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.