These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7892446)

  • 21. Contrast material for combined abdominal and pelvic CT: can cost be reduced by increasing the concentration and decreasing the volume?
    Baker ME; Beam C; Leder R; Gulliver D; Paine SS; Dunnick NR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 8430570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT.
    Hollett MD; Jorgensen MJ; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):359-61. PubMed ID: 7724753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver.
    Baron RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Aug; 163(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 8037023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: bolus vs. infusion.
    Burgener FA; Hamlin DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Aug; 137(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 6789645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hepatic imaging with multidetector CT.
    Ji H; McTavish JD; Mortele KJ; Wiesner W; Ros PR
    Radiographics; 2001 Oct; 21 Spec No():S71-80. PubMed ID: 11598249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality in dynamic CT: a clinical discussion.
    Foley WD
    Radiographics; 1993 Jan; 13(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 8426933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CT attenuation of normal liver parenchyma on delayed scanning with iohexol.
    Tidebrant G; Lukes P; Wihed A
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):502-3. PubMed ID: 1389665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CT densities in delayed iodine hepatic scanning.
    Perkerson RB; Erwin BC; Baumgartner BR; Phillips VM; Torres WE; Clements JL; Gedgaudas-McClees K; Bernardino ME
    Radiology; 1985 May; 155(2):445-6. PubMed ID: 3983398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of unenhanced MR imaging vs contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or pelvis.
    Lessler DS; Sullivan SD; Stergachis A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 8010246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Techniques for computed tomography of the liver.
    Nelson RC
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 Nov; 29(6):1199-212. PubMed ID: 1947041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients.
    Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 7972770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.
    Megibow AJ; Jacob G; Heiken JP; Paulson EK; Hopper KD; Sica G; Saini S; Birnbaum BA; Redvanley R; Fishman EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 11222185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results.
    Kopka L; Funke M; Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):282-4. PubMed ID: 7892486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Helical computed tomography for abdominal imaging.
    Krasny RM; Lu DS
    World J Surg; 1996 Feb; 20(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 8661827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis?
    Patten RM; Byun JY; Freeny PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 8273641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinction between cavernous hemangiomas of the liver and hepatic metastases on CT: value of contrast enhancement patterns.
    Leslie DF; Johnson CD; Johnson CM; Ilstrup DM; Harmsen WS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 7863883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Functional imaging in computed tomography. The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the study of renal function and physiology.
    Dawson P; Peters AM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S79-84; discussion S85-6. PubMed ID: 8282509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT of multiple sclerosis: reassessment of delayed scanning with high doses of contrast material.
    Spiegel SM; Viñuela F; Fox AJ; Pelz DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Sep; 145(3):497-500. PubMed ID: 3875253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic CT of the liver.
    Marchal G; Baert AL
    Radiologe; 1992 May; 32(5):211-6. PubMed ID: 1321979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus.
    Kopka L; Funke M; Vosshenrich R; Hagemann A; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 7790550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.