These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7892486)

  • 1. Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results.
    Kopka L; Funke M; Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):282-4. PubMed ID: 7892486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability.
    Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Sadick M; Lachmann R; Georgi M
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 9457188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material.
    Kopka L; Rodenwaldt J; Fischer U; Mueller DW; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 8888218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
    Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic bolus tracking in monophasic spiral CT of the liver: liver-to-lesion conspicuity.
    Mehnert F; Pereira PL; Trübenbach J; Kopp AF; Claussen CD
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 11354750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT.
    Hollett MD; Jorgensen MJ; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):359-61. PubMed ID: 7724753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biphasic spiral CT of the liver: automatic bolus tracking or time delay?
    Mehnert F; Pereira PL; Trübenbach J; Kopp AF; Claussen CD
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(3):427-31. PubMed ID: 11288847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM; Roberts SC; Ducic I; Tefft MC; Olson MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus.
    Kopka L; Funke M; Vosshenrich R; Hagemann A; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 7790550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls.
    Oliver JH; Baron RL
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 8816509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast media in biphasic helical CT of the liver.
    Valls C; Pozuelo O; Pons LC
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):827-9. PubMed ID: 9609913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of noncontrast phase in detecting hypervascular metastases with triphasic helical CT?
    Huenerbein R; Reuter P; Kuhn FP
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):585-6. PubMed ID: 9807596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (< or = 1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms.
    Hollett MD; Jeffrey RB; Nino-Murcia M; Jorgensen MJ; Harris DP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):879-84. PubMed ID: 7726040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multidetector row CT of the liver.
    Oto A; Tamm EP; Szklaruk J
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Sep; 43(5):827-48, vii. PubMed ID: 16098342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hepatic metastasis detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods.
    Miller DL; Simmons JT; Chang R; Ward BA; Shawker TH; Doppman JL; Chang AE
    Radiology; 1987 Dec; 165(3):785-90. PubMed ID: 3685361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: simple diagnostic sign with dynamic bolus CT.
    Quinn SF; Benjamin GG
    Radiology; 1992 Feb; 182(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 1732978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Moyers JH; Chezmar JL; Hoel MJ; Jones EC; Peterson JE; Cork RD; Bernardino ME
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.