99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7892501)
1. Anatomic changes in the pelvis after uncomplicated vaginal delivery: evaluation with serial MR imaging.
Willms AB; Brown ED; Kettritz UI; Kuller JA; Semelka RC
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 7892501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [MR Imaging of the pelvis in the diagnosis of the endometrium in breast cancer patients in tamoxifen therapy].
Hauth E; Libera H; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 16508840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The uterine cervix on in vitro and in vivo MR images: a study of zonal anatomy and vascularity using an enveloping cervical coil.
deSouza NM; Hawley IC; Schwieso JE; Gilderdale DJ; Soutter WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):607-12. PubMed ID: 8079853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [An MRI study of the normal pelvis in the immediate postpartum period].
Pellerin M; Colau JC; Rebibo G; Savey L
J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 80(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 10417891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The pelvis after cesarean section and vaginal delivery: normal MR findings.
Woo GM; Twickler DM; Stettler RW; Erdman WA; Brown CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1249-52. PubMed ID: 8249736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Female pelvic anatomy: MR assessment of variations during the menstrual cycle and with use of oral contraceptives.
McCarthy S; Tauber C; Gore J
Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 3715022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix during pregnancy: effect of gestational age and prior vaginal birth.
House M; O'Callaghan M; Bahrami S; Chelmow D; Kini J; Wu D; Patz S; Bhadelia RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 193(4):1554-60. PubMed ID: 16202756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical incompetence: preliminary evaluation with MR imaging.
Hricak H; Chang YC; Cann CE; Parer JT
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):821-6. PubMed ID: 2305065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical assessment by magnetic resonance imaging--its relationship to gestational age and interval to delivery.
Chan YL; Lam WW; Lau TK; Wong SP; Li CY; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):155-9. PubMed ID: 9579179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Vaginal ultrasound in puerperium. Cervix and lower uterine segment on the 1st p. p. day and uterus 6 weeks post partum].
Eppel W; Schurz B; Frigo P; Kudielka I; Asseryanis E; Reinold E
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(5):217-20. PubMed ID: 1299085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zonal anatomy of the cervix: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens.
Scoutt LM; McCauley TR; Flynn SD; Luthringer DJ; McCarthy SM
Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):159-62. PubMed ID: 8416558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience.
Hricak H; Alpers C; Crooks LE; Sheldon PE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Dec; 141(6):1119-28. PubMed ID: 6606306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix in women at high risk for preterm delivery.
de Tejada BM; Faltin DL; Kinkel K; Guittier MJ; Boulvain M; Irion O
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Nov; 24(11):1392-7. PubMed ID: 21303215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Zones of the uterus: discrepancy between US and MR images.
Mitchell DG; Schonholz L; Hilpert PL; Pennell RG; Blum L; Rifkin MD
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):827-31. PubMed ID: 2406787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser ablation of the endometrium: MR appearance during and after treatment and the relation of MR appearance to clinical outcome.
deSouza NM; McMillan DL; Puni RK; Coutts GA; Hall AS; Harris DN; Young IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterine neoplasms: MR imaging.
Worthington JL; Balfe DM; Lee JK; Gersell DJ; Heiken JP; Ling D; Glazer HS; Jacobs AJ; Kao MS; McClennan BL
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 3010375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis.
Picus D; Lee JK
Urol Radiol; 1986; 8(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 3547999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy?
Huerta-Enochian GS; Katz VL; Fox LK; Hamlin JA; Kollath JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 16731086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance signal characteristics of the cervix as pregnancy advances.
Pates JA; Yost NP; Oliver Q; McIntire DD; Twickler DM
Reprod Sci; 2007 Jul; 14(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 17913963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images.
Kang S; Turner DA; Foster GS; Rapoport MI; Spencer SA; Wang JZ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1145-50. PubMed ID: 8615259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
