372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7892735)
1. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.
Landy MS; Maloney LT; Johnston EB; Young M
Vision Res; 1995 Feb; 35(3):389-412. PubMed ID: 7892735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaction of visual prior constraints.
Mamassian P; Landy MS
Vision Res; 2001 Sep; 41(20):2653-68. PubMed ID: 11520511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues.
Young MJ; Landy MS; Maloney LT
Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(18):2685-96. PubMed ID: 8296465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Illuminant estimation as cue combination.
Maloney LT
J Vis; 2002; 2(6):493-504. PubMed ID: 12678647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.
Hillis JM; Watt SJ; Landy MS; Banks MS
J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):967-92. PubMed ID: 15669906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual biases and cue weighting in perception of 3D slant from texture and stereo information.
Saunders JA; Chen Z
J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination.
Rosas P; Wagemans J; Ernst MO; Wichmann FA
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 May; 22(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 15898539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling the combination of motion, stereo, and vergence angle cues to visual depth.
Fine I; Jacobs RA
Neural Comput; 1999 Aug; 11(6):1297-330. PubMed ID: 10423497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adapting internal statistical models for interpreting visual cues to depth.
Seydell A; Knill DC; Trommershäuser J
J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):1.1-27. PubMed ID: 20465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The intrinsic constraint model for stereo-motion integration.
Tassinari H; Domini F
Perception; 2008; 37(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 18399249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements.
Wismeijer DA; Erkelens CJ; van Ee R; Wexler M
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):25. PubMed ID: 20884574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception.
van Ee R; Adams WJ; Mamassian P
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2003 Jul; 20(7):1398-406. PubMed ID: 12868644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.
Burge J; Fowlkes CC; Banks MS
J Neurosci; 2010 May; 30(21):7269-80. PubMed ID: 20505093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues.
Knill DC
Vision Res; 2003 Mar; 43(7):831-54. PubMed ID: 12639607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of 3D shape in context: contrast and assimilation.
van der Kooij K; te Pas SF
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):746-51. PubMed ID: 19385089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues.
Adams WJ; Mamassian P
J Vis; 2004 Nov; 4(10):921-9. PubMed ID: 15595895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reweighting visual cues by touch.
van Beers RJ; van Mierlo CM; Smeets JB; Brenner E
J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21954298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The intrinsic constraint model and Fechnerian sensory scaling.
Domini F; Caudek C
J Vis; 2009 Feb; 9(2):25.1-15. PubMed ID: 19271935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant.
Knill DC
J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):5.1-24. PubMed ID: 17685801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism.
Keefe BD; Hibbard PB; Watt SJ
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1246-1257. PubMed ID: 21371484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
