BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7895572)

  • 1. Retrospective analysis of non-correlating cervical smears and colposcopically directed biopsies.
    Sidawy MK; Siriaunkgul S; Frost AR
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 7895572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discordance between uterine cervical cytology and biopsy: results and etiologies of a one-year audit.
    Tzeng JE; Chen JT; Chang MC; Ho WL
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 1999 Jan; 15(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 10063792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
    Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Koilocytotic atypia and underlying dysplasia.
    Shepherd J; Lynch W
    J Fam Pract; 1991 Aug; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 1890397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of moderate and severe inflammation on class I Papanicolaou smear.
    Lawley TB; Lee RB; Kapela R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):997-9. PubMed ID: 2234731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
    Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
    Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Colposcopic, cytologic and histologic changes in the uterine cervix caused by human papilloma viruses].
    Milojković M; Pajtler M; Makarović Z
    Lijec Vjesn; 1991; 113(11-12):380-3. PubMed ID: 1669603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smear.
    Maggi R; Zannoni E; Giorda G; Biraghi P; Sideri M
    Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Dec; 35(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 2599462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cervical screening and surveillance of the cervix uteri before the age of 20].
    Benmoura D; Sperandeo D; Duprez D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 3701000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of uterine cervical cytology and biopsy results: indications and outcomes for colposcopy.
    Swinker M; Cutlip AC; Ogle D
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordance between cytologic and histologic reports in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Results of a one-year audit.
    Rasbridge SA; Nayagam M
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):648-53. PubMed ID: 7631537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Papanicolaou smear discrepancy: resolution by review.
    Cline MK; Baxley EG; Montgomery RP
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1994; 7(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 8135142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and condyloma: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy of posttreatment follow-up methods.
    Falcone T; Ferenczy A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Feb; 154(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 3946513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of suspicious and positive colposcopic, cytologic and histologic findings in the uterine cervix.
    Szczepanik E; Helpap B
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 6575537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytologic/histologic correlation for quality control in cervicovaginal cytology. Experience with 1,582 paired cases.
    Joste NE; Crum CP; Cibas ES
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 103(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 7817940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Colposcopic-histologic results in 97 patients with mild dysplasia shown by Pap test].
    Crescini C; Pezzica E; Artuso A; Comerio D; Reale D; Bonaldi A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Nov; 43(11):509-12. PubMed ID: 1784407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.